Really? In my experience it's been the opposite. It's like how you can learn more about art by trying to recreate it than just looking.
201 karma · joined December 24, 2022
Really? In my experience it's been the opposite. It's like how you can learn more about art by trying to recreate it than just looking.
Really? That must be some ancient history, because I've seen rambling walls of text on the internet derided for decades. I always appreciated the Feynmanian respect for economy of time over traditional formats, where if authors said their piece but still had space they'd damn well fill it.
(Of course, slide all the way down that slippery slope and you'll just hit Twitter.)
That was years ago and I'm still on it.
Makes sense. If castle doctrine applied to the skies, people could take potshots at low flying aircraft above their house. I guess that's one way to prevent becoming a flyover state...
Not necessarily mutually exclusive. It's like professional wrestling, stage magic, or politics. Some lies people really love.
Sometimes a project gets funded by someone who wants the team to look and act a certain way and actual productivity doesn't even factor in. You're not 'right' if you've fundamentally misunderstood what you're doing there in the first place. Either take their money and play along or leave. That's the call you can make.
Really? I noticed it's slower to start up but other than that it seems the same. I use it pretty regularly because foobar components handle formats the others can't.
Other than that, I'd say Audacious is the closest Linux analogue to foobar2000. My one big gripe was freezing up for a bit when a stream cuts out (blocking socket?) but they fixed that.
If I were doing a professional project, I'd be hesitant to use it over something with more popularity and support. The syntax has so many variations two files can look like two totally different config languages, which is both cool and alarming.