note: I've just read similar comments, with an actual explanation of what happened.
90 karma · joined February 11, 2023
note: I've just read similar comments, with an actual explanation of what happened.
It is true that British people do make more of their identity about it, and they tend to ignore _really_ old stuff (i.e. most of the quirky stuff is Victorian, not _that_ old).
(disclaimer, am British)
It's not that it isn't interesting (it is!), but the soothing voice and calm delivery is the best sleeping aid I've had in many years!
Take a look at Switzerland with four different official languages (five if you include English for many official settings), something not found in the US.
But my $0.02: what Crystal does best for me is the "fun factor". It has a very good balance between a dynamic language "feel" with the safety of static typing, and with native compilation.
I can just prototype things willy-nilly with minimal ceremony and not worry too much if it starts getting big.
Personally, I find this a refreshing admission.
He is free to use whatever other means he wants to spread his ideas. It's not like he's being shipped off to a forced labour camp.
Scraping source using dodgy methods almost sounds like "pirated" Linux.
- If I provided _modified_ binaries
- I also have to provide the sources
That's what's happening now for people that can download the binaries.
What happened before was:
- _Anyone_ could download the sources
(Not a GPL requirement).
So, now, IIUC if you can download the binaries you can download the sources. If you can't download the binaries (not a customer, for instance) you can't download the sources.
The contract termination is not related to GPL in this sense.
It is wonderful that people can see, but how much money you have should have no bearing on whether you stay blind or not.
These people are victims of a system and charity is just painting over the cracks.
Perhaps he could devote his energy to start the change.
Charity (and alms) is what people did back in the day. Some societies moved on.
[1] Better said: I'm not against charitable acts. I'm against charity as a replacement for an humane and fair society. Sometimes it feels like having a water station next to workers being being whipped to build the pyramids. Perhaps stop the whipping?
In my case, personally, this is a product of my upbringing. My parents were the first generation of our family to have a little extra income (grandparents were poor farmers).
I have a good salary by all accounts, but still count the beans, since this was what my father taught me. I am extremely weary of spending large sums of money in anything.
If you do what everybody else does, you can blame outside factors if it goes wrong.
If you decide to be the one that _doesn't_ follow the trend, if it goes wrong, the blame falls on you.