201 karma · joined January 20, 2021
We sacrifice our time with our children for future career earnings to maximize lifetime income. People in this discussion throw around terms like GDP growth due to increased labour market participation from working moms...
It's ok just to accept what's happening. its not like you don't know what you're doing. Life is full of unpleasant tradeoffs.
An easy way to see this is to look at a topic that is split in the academy along geographical lines - the entry in wiki will often favour whatever region the original cabal sided with and give the other short thrift.
Meeting a wikipedia admin in real life is often eye opening and explains some of these choices.
The old encyclopedias were more transparent; siding with their own cultures scholars in a way that was generally more uniform. Wiki masquerades as the final objective authority but has the same old issues burried and obscured.
Even an undergrad intro course on a given historical subject will often come into violent conflict with a given entry.
The best entries are scientific topics, like botany or physics - and this impression of mine is probbaly based on ignorance.
In the turmoil of regime change in Russia production would fall and probably not come back online again for decades
When the wall fell Russian production declined and has never reached its 1980s Peak because of the geography of Russia. In fact I think most of the wells that were turned off at that time have never come back online and recent production increases are due to new infrastructure being built
2) the violinist is not offspring, and there is no parent-child relationship
3) extraordinary means were and are required to maintain the violinist, this is unlike a pregnancy - where extraordinary means are required to end it.
Does anyone beleive this would have worked if they went with a Leander team and decreased spend? Made a simple MVP and tried to slowly grow?
Just wondering. I feel their idea is pretty mediocre and some very similar solutions already exist. The basic pitch 'one click buying for grandma' is not something I would enable for my parents or my grandmother - they'd just buy too much crap on qvc like sites.
In the north masonry homes have a lot of problems with freeze thaw cycles. As far as upgrades , remodeling, overall costs goes stick built homes are superior.
1) resistance genes are already in the genome, they don't need to be added. This means the entire endeavor is unnecessary
2) this is an internationally recognized definition of genetic pollution, it's controversial only with a few hardliners.
Two things about the American chestnut are relevant: 1) the percentage of forest it occupied is widely overstated, seemingly due to exageration thru retelling of the story. It was usually a top ten tree at most sites, far from the numbers you usually see in articles. The these numbers are from ideal sites for its colonization or areas where it was planted by humans. This is widely known and studied, but people who write about it to lay audiences tend to use exaggerated figures out of context.
2) many specimens survived the blight due to partial resistance, not all were wiped out.
All we need to do is wait and they'll do just fine. Even a traditional breeding program would work in a few generations, there's really no good reason to rush this stuff.
it's common to interpret the structure of genesis as being a riff off of earlier myths, in a critical way. The structure is often parallel, but also often different as though to draw a comparison to the mind of the reader. We see a harmonious creation account rather than a violent one, and a creator God who is master over both earth and water.
Anyone who studied religion at an undergraduate level (or at a good highschool) knows this. The specific narrative you're weaving is , however, highly speculative.
It should not surprise Christians or jews that the ancient Israelites recognized other gods, this is covered extensively in the Bible. There are frequent references to the 'God's of the nations' in the old testament, particularly evident in the greek.
The existnece of miltiple lower case G 'gods' - is still held in even the New Testament 'principalities and powers' are 'gods over the nations'. I think, it is fair to say that modern jews and Christians alike still hold this to be true.
I tend to view the opening of genesis as being a take-down of prior creation myths from other cultures in the region, but I'm unaware of exactly the same story in any of them.