68 karma · joined November 2, 2016
http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/downloads/methaneuk/...
I remember changing the channel on a color HeathKit TV at my grandparents by shaking house keys because the ultrasonic remote sensor circuit interpreted it as channel down. (It had a diagnostic and circuit diagram on a fold-down panel IIRC.)
Also my father and grandfather both made multiple technology generations of oscilloscopes from kits. And, my father opened an electrical automotive shop in Santa Clara, thanks in part to learning from HeathKit and other study-at-home electronics courses.
Plus, we're talking about TC.
Another issue is the promulgation and veneration of taboo, protected groups as being automatically special proportional to an university-proscribed, identity/attribute(s) neoliberal caste system. Bollocks.
I think such lists come from a positive intention for there to be less arbitrary discrimination and to motive likely-targeted/underrepresented individuals to succeed. I'm not sure how a special list helps motivate people with fundamental confidence, but instead may temporarily confer false confidence based on non-skill attribute(s) except by an inkling of almost getting on a generic list.
Do not install untrusted, unverifiable apps is security 101.
GPG signing and releasing fingerprints of all released artifacts on an https://-served release notice would accomplish nearly the same thing, but requires more steps and causes a confusing `“HandBrake” can’t be opened because it is from an unidentified developer.` dialog.
It is a best-practice to both GPG sign all release artifacts and use vendor-specific code-signing / app stores, otherwise conversion will suffer with each additional hoop multiplied by the N of the entire user-base resulting in much more time-wasting.
End-to-end integrity also prevents entire classes of attacks such as hacked CDNs, hacked networks and so on.
Back at uni (somewhere else), on-campus we had a block-purchased meal system which was managed and outsourced to Sodexho Marriott (it was greasy, boring shit).
Stanford Dining dining halls were usually better-than-average because they had/have respectably awesome executive chefs (mostly from high-volume commercial culinary backgrounds) usually hemmed in by over-zealous cheapskates in management) but with more freedom to meal plan outside of generic/corporate standards, source ingredients from managed vendors and generally more competition (esp. when the Dining Clubs were operational but still with other on-campus options like Treehouse and other non-RDE Tresidder; ie peanut-free Ricker). IIRC there was prime rib and king crab sometimes, and there were french fries which were knock-offs of McDonald's. Btw, Subway and Peet's (Clark Center) are/were RDE-managed franchises.
http://bensommer.com/blog/big-dig-big-corruption/
There's a mix of ineptitude, poor/non-planning and some shady deals. With larger projects, more waste is essentially inevitable because of the number of moving parts and limited communication paths.
And, also how many pounds of Costco quinoa I still have stockpiled that needs to be eaten.
Certainly, people whom are more affluent could purchase additional safeguards (ie automatic external defibrillators, whole-house water-filtration) while those whom are elderly/poor will likely need assistance meeting minimum standards.
Also, clipboard auditing (timber stickers) shouldn't be a substitute for inspection common-sense.
https://rde.stanford.edu/dining/caf%C3%A9%E2%80%99s-and-mark...
https://transportation.stanford.edu/parking/purchase-a-parki...
http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Id_Anthology
https://www.mobygames.com/game/dos/id-anthology
They're going to pester you endlessly for free labor post-sales if you let them, but consider offering a support contract on a per-incident / per-hour basis which could Lingchi-them, consulting-style.
"Safe-space" utopias never scale: there will be SJW bickering and whining and/or extreme self-censorship which will lead to an extremely boring (and irrelevant) platform. Plus, online platforms never have to guarantee free speech... they're businesses and organizations which can choose to do just about whatever they like within various, regional legal limits.
(Business is like life, love and war: difficult)
https://cyber.harvard.edu/cybersecurity/Economics_of_Malware
https://www.coursera.org/learn/malsoftware
At some point, it would make sense anonymized malware (i2p, tor only) may go open source similar to commercial open source but instead because of scene cred / blackmarket consulting.