3,393 karma · joined August 11, 2011
Which is exactly why I always link to the source. Always check the source material, whether you agree with an article or not. Most people on HN (and OSNews) do so, luckily.
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2011/10/study-on-worldwide-u...
[1] http://www.osnews.com/story/25556/Understanding_the_bin_sbin...
EDIT for clarification: layers upon layers upon layers of virtual directory structures don't count. It only adds complexity and makes the system more obtuse.
Do we have any actual figures to support this claim? I highly doubt its validity, you see.
Great work by Zachary Johnson.
Nope. It doesn't mean "reaches the most people". It means "has the most impact on the world". I think that Android will be the technology that allows people in poorer places of the world to have the internet - and thus, knowledge, and thus, power - in their pocket. That is going to change the world in a significant way.
Even something as simple as this: the internet may have information on the best way to treat sick cattle, or how to best treat certain crops. Heck, in more developed areas, it may cut the reaction time of aid services drastically.
(you already see this happening in Kenya, as linked in the article: http://singularityhub.com/2011/08/16/80-android-phone-sells-... ).
You're right, and I thought about including it in the article. However, I decided not to include it as to not cloud the waters, for two reasons:
1) Oracle v Google is a US case, and this opinion only covers the EU.
2) Oracle v Google seems to be more about patent infringement than copyright infringement. This opinion only covers copyright.
On top of that, OSNews barely does any reviews - only a few every year. In other words, your post seems to be of a trollish nature :).
http://www.osnews.com/story/24882/The_History_of_App_and_the...
[disclaimer: I'm the author of both the parent article as well as the article linked to in this comment]