Point taken though...
80 karma · joined January 31, 2014
Point taken though...
World population. Up and to the right.
A quick google search shows that whilst population was pretty stable in UK in the 80s, since then it's been steadily rising. Growth is now 0.75% a year.
But that growth rate is deceptive. Look at
https://www.google.co.uk/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9...
But that growth rate is deceptive - it "looks" low. But if you check the absolute numbers:
In the UK, population has grown by around 10% in the last 20 years, and it's on an increasingly upward trend.
https://www.google.co.uk/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9...
Just anecdotally, if you live in the UK, you'll know how many new homes they're building all over the countryside.
World population: https://www.google.co.uk/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9...
I'm glad you can see that graph levelling off, but I can't see it...
But cancer when you're over 60? That's basically just dying of old age...
Earth is full. Our population has doubled in the short time I've been alive. Doesn't that scare the shit out of anyone else?
Imagine what would happen if you suddenly cured all forms of cancer. People would live even longer. Population would shoot up. Lack of housing, lack of jobs. More pensioners...
edit: Downvote brigade... why am I wrong? What's going to save us from our own 'success'? How many more billion people can the planet take?
Reminds me of when they tried to rename Manholes to "Personnel Access Units" to avoid offending women.
If you're offended that something is named a 'manhole', you probably have too much time on your hands.
JSON is a subset of javascript which already existed. He just coined the phrases 'json' and wrote it down.
That in no way points to inequality. It points to the fact that men and women want different things, and have different strengths and weaknesses.
The idea that there aren't as many women in IT as men because of some sort of discrimination is laughable.
Do you watch American Idol? Do you read celebrity gossip magazines? Do you play bingo or the lottery? Do you watch Fox news? Do you buy a newspaper? Do you click on ads?
Millions and millions of people do all of the above - they are not outliers.
On your previous point "How should a lie be useful to me? I just can't see it.", we have this problem all the time outside of advertising with general information. Look at the average news story on Reddit. It's probably biased, probably a half truth, probably out of context, probably only half the facts of the story. Everything is biased and needs careful inspection before you can take it at face value.
However, there are obvious ways to do this. For example, I "trust" Lego. That means if they advertise a new awesome Batman Lego Arkham Asylum set, I'll know it's going to be quality, and awesome, and I'll buy it. If however it's some new unheard of company, I'd probably want to go examine it in a toy shop before I buy it.
I'm not trying to convince you that advertising is useful, I don't think you'll change your mind. But hopefully you'll see that you're not in a majority, and the majority think advertising is useful.
Who wouldn't want to see adverts for cool gadgets, toys, houses, suits, holidays, etc?
Probably buy something each week that I saw previously advertised somewhere.
The last thing was probably some pig electric fencing that was advertised in a pig magazine last week.
You're an outlier. Perhaps you're just so determined to be against advertising you can't see the value in it. Without advertising, how would we know what products exist?
Same with adverts in magazines. It shows me products and services I didn't know about, some of which will be useful to me.
If I buy a car magazine, guess what... it has some adverts for cars and car related products. Some of which are interesting and useful to me.
If adblock usage ever became mainstream, it'd become an arms war which advertisers would win.
So it's not just a matter of convincing their userbase to stop blocking ads, you'd need to tell their current userbase to go away, and invite a better userbase to come and click on ads.
Reddit created this problem by fostering a culture of anti advertising early on.
Reddit should probably just become some non-profit foundation like wikipedia and show begging adverts.
You want to think about what 'normal' people do, and like. Because there's a hell of a lot more of them.
Of course you can have success with a niche product catering to minorities, but it's a lot easier to just make something most people want.
It's more in line with wikipedia.
You're a small but vocal minority.
Just like people who don't own TVs, people who don't listen to pop music, watch reality TV, indulge in celebrity gossip etc.
You're an outlier - understand and accept that the vast majority of people are not like you.
"crowdfunding" is completely unregulated, and just like other startups that decide regulation isn't a good idea (Mt Gox, airbnb, that unlicensed taxi thing, etc etc), things rarely end well.
For every 1 legitimate crowdfunding campaign, there's probably 100 that are just there to scam people out of money. And when people are increasingly scammed out of money, who will they look to to compensate them? Their government.
If you want less stress, or to calm down, the last thing you should be doing is staring at a computer screen. Go outdoors. Exercise. Meet real people.
Can't put into words how horrible this idea is.
That's kinda why banks are regulated surely.