173 karma · joined August 28, 2019
(cache[key] = cache[key] || fn(...args));
I guess it goes to show that copying answers from stack overflow might not be the best idea, whether it's done manually or using ML.
It's the same idea: you have a synthetic version of an asset trading for the same price of the real asset. If people start demanding the real asset, there isn't enough of it to go around and prices start to rise.
Not saying that's what's going to happen, but it's not absurd.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/russia-steps-up-new-law-to-cont...
If they don't like something about the job conditions, they can vote democratically to change it.
I can't form a tax union and negotiate with the government, why should they be able to?
Seems like he still holds a grudge.
But seriously, sure some people just push blockchain stuff to get money from investors. But I can buy drugs using Bitcoin. I can't buy drugs using git. So there's probably a difference between them.
Agree with the general point, but the guy burned 8 million dollars in investor money to get to the point where the business is "just fine". It's not really a good example IMO.
Tesla's market cap in June 2016 was 35 billion. It's 43 billion now. That's not that much value created. The S&P went up almost 50 percent in that time.
It's all besides the point anyway, since many shareholders sold their shares because of this fraud. They don't care what he's doing now, they just want their money back.
It's in everyone's best interest to have checks on self dealing CEOs. If people can't trust public companies to behave, the whole system breaks down.
I understand your frustration, but the problem isn't that it's far away geographically, it's that your country is allowing criminals to use your IPs to do bad stuff.
No offence, but if you're not interested in people, or at least in learning to fake it, how do you expect to manage them?
Swift 5.1 enables the creation of binary frameworks that can be shared with others leveraging the language’s added support for module stability.
In contrast, the authors write that replacing panels more often with newer and more advanced models would allow cross-compatibility between the panels and the system, allowing the framework itself to remain the same while new panels are popped on and off.
So even though the installation and replacement labor is what's expensive, they assume that some kind of cross compatibility will appear, and it will be cheaper? Seems like quite a leap.
You gotta love Applespeak. "Earlier versions" means all available versions.
In WeWork's case it's probably impossible to remove him both legally and because the whole company is built around his personality cult.
Not sure that it's a problem now though. Like Matt Levine suggested[0], WeWork did a lot of weird shit when they were private, but now they want public money, they need to behave more like a responsible company. It's kind of what's supposed to happen because of the disclosure, it's just that most of the time companies take care of governance issues before the S-1.
[0] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-09-13/we-is-...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/wework-the-workspace-giant-want...
The U.S. still has the edge in fundamental research, he said, but Chinese companies have easier access to the consumer market thanks to Beijing's national AI strategy, which promotes the spread of the technology.
Yes, if you're starting out labeling right wing politicians as nazis, you'll end up with an AI that classifies them as nazis.
But even if it wasn't, Brave has special filters for sites that have anti-adblock measures, and it's spoofing the user agent to make it seem like regular Chrome.
https://mobile.twitter.com/googlewmc/status/1161725709926182...
https://geneticsexbehavior.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/g...
Seems like the researchers also created a website:
The Brave thing is just a weird way to feel better about breaking an implicit social contract.