365 karma · joined April 10, 2021
(Early 20's, tech boomer)
website: <under construction>
email: mohit at precompute period net
And yeah, I've had good friends from almost every state in India. Some of them were weird about it, most don't really care. So-called "nationalists" will screw you over in any region if you're a migrant.
Anyway, it's not a binary issue. It's just something that happens, and it's not possible to legislate.
BTW, to anyone that hasn't lived in India: you don't understand how extensive """caste discrimination""" is or how it impacts society. You just don't.
I have, and I didn't find it to be useful for anything I did. I can do what it does with a search engine and trusty C-f. Also, TTS exists.
It's 50% tech and 50% marketing (and I doubt it's 50% tech at that), it's not gonna upend anything. Except maybe increase the authenticity of online scams and make people get more degrees in machine learning. And yeah, make the people that rely on it bound as it degrades their skills.
It's basically the "internet is educationally useful" argument. At some point everyone's gotta use it but you can live without it just fine. And even though people tout its usefulness for everything good, the majority of data transferred is porno.
So when you're looking at actually writing software that needs to be dependable / modifiable / bug free, you'd need a massive overhaul of whatever software stack is being used, so there's very little human-assisting "cruft", and instead you'd want a lot of supporting material for a model, which might look like something written in languages used for formal verification of programs.
The promise of GOFAI was about having a human-understandable bottom-to-top framework, and the current "AI" paradigm is at odds with it. The "formal verification" assumption, then, skews towards GOFAI. But since there has to be some human support for the current not-there-yet AI to write software, we might see yet another abstraction layer based on NN / something newer in the years to come.
You HAVE to believe they bring in value because... well, you gotta believe.
Take diligent notes: My system (in emacs) helps me out here. Taking a few seconds to look for a solution in your notes trumps going through a wild goose chase on the internet only to encounter links that you immediately half-recognize as something you tried six months ago when you had $issue. "Quantified life" stuff helps out here. Here's a big protip: never delete your bash history.
Who can build [X] the fastest, from scratch. Could be a house, clothes, food, etc. Known objective, and meritocratic.
You can still try and be competent in a year or two, but you'll sound weird saying certain words.
Read more, speak more, and try to not translate from your native language to english.
I've never heard about this before. Seems like gen Z (gen alpha?) is increasingly tech illiterate and tech-dependent. Not ten years ago, most kids weren't given phones by their parents. I guess it would be impossible to graduate high school these days without a phone.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2019/08/15/increasing-u-s-head-siz...
Last link has a formula to calculate cranial volume.
Animal intelligence is vastly underplayed. Ants seem to be a very intelligent creature but they're little more than part of nature to us. We're similarly adapted to our environment, and those animals are adapted to our patterns and mentation by virtue of millennia of close contact / purposeful genetic pushes (eg, dogs)
The only requirement is to have a unique number of coins from the fake coin pouch. Since we don't know which one that is, every pouch gets a different number of coins, and not necessarily a sequence starting from 1. Then, you weigh them all assuming they're all real, but wait, they're not! So you take the excess weight, divide it by the excess weight per fake coin, and the bag from which you took out that many coins is the bag with the fake coins.
He'll end up with two college interns that he'll haggle with for the internship certificates / recommendations. That's what usually ends up happening.
This is what really grinds my gears. No one seems to talk about how using ONE company's API for a paid service / product is VERY bad design. Using OpenAI's API to make your "product" (actually just a text template with an overdesigned website that doesn't even process data) is the height of grifting. It's similar to rolling "your own search engine" but actually passing all the queries through google. A lot of eyebrows would shoot up on that, but very few here because the marketing at OpenAI is really something. They're really great at keeping their mouths shut and letting their competitors and product take the heat. Very sneaky IMO.
Also, most of the AI offerings seem to target people that don't understand what it really is or what it does -- I'd expect a very hasty "seal of authentication" or something really soom, that'd be mandatory anywhere you'd want to "prove" your data is actually yours.