If you're familiar with HAR files, this is what's used
228 karma · joined October 4, 2015
If you're familiar with HAR files, this is what's used
The responsive nature of the new frontpage is garbage. Because you expect that at least 95 percent of developers using the site are doing so on the desktop. If your browser window is too small, you lose search behind a hamburger button and a navigation menu that only looks like it belongs in your hand, not on your desktop.
We're lucky this only affects the frontpage, and not within any repos were developers are doing actual work
It's the replacement for the vintage volume control, while a little sub-par by any modern standard, you can pick the input/output device per application
Just because something is closed source, doesn't mean it's impossible to reverse engineer. The entire system is compiled into a javascript webpack, alongside just reading web requests/their documentation, doing some basic functionality in an alternative implementation is really easy.
This apparently breaks the terms of service, but they are only enforce this if you're an outlier for the number of API requests you send.
The most well known 3rd party client would be Ripcord, which I use for it's Slack features
From the readme, you have to navigate to an entirely different repo, which contains only contains a handful of preview files.
Even then, they are all gifs, so if you wanted static content you're out of luck, as gifs are pretty much the incorrect format for lengthy content such as this. Files average 6-10MB each, so if you're actually on mobile, github won't preview them (how nice, they think of my data plan).
Consider ShareX [https://github.com/ShareX/ShareX], who quite some time ago did strip out their entire readme for putting more information on their own website, but they still have a gif showing a majority functions from their application. It's less than 200kb, because someone decided to optimise their content to an acceptable extent
below 1012 pixels and they remove search and anything in navigation for a hamburger button, where there is clearly still enough room for these elements.
at 768 pixels they remove the new repository button.
They should be focusing on their desktop experience. Sure their mobile experience is still fucked, but you'll find that at least 90% of people using github every day are form a PC. Who programs from their phone?
The fucking navigation menu on a browser that big is pretty inexcusable. It's a step back from any coherent design
I don't exactly see this as a great solution, but with my limited use, it surprises me that this is restricted to a CJK input
But as well as when they started merging liked posts into the content feed on the main apps, it did remove the critical thing if it being an option for feedback to a post, without sharing the content to your own timeline (a retweet).
I don't understand any logic behind this change at all, and if there is, there's a paywall. But twitter is for everything, not just politics. If you're using politics to drive your platform, it's a shitshow for anyone else that uses the platform for more recreational purposes
If you're thinking they're going to check the actual software. Like ass I'm going to let someone into my house to check if I'm breaking their terms of service
Is this using javascript or wasm?