7,544 karma · joined February 29, 2008
+--------------------------------+
| https://andrewcantino.com |
| |
| @tectonic |
| https://github.com/cantino/ |
+--------------------------------+NASA needs multiple lander options; putting all their cards on a lunar Starship landing was always a bit ridiculous, even if it seems reasonably likely to happen. So if you want the Artemis program to actually succeed, this is likely a good thing. However, with Congress in a deadlock around the debt ceiling, and SLS costing $4B per launch, this is only going to add to Artemis's serious funding challenges.
If you're interested in the space industry in general, I'll cover this more next week in the weekly Orbital Index newsletter (https://orbitalindex.com) which I co-author with blach.
The problem is a lack of a precautionary principle— manufacturers can change one molecule and re-market their product and groups like the EPA have to do extensive research on each new variant to show danger. Molecules are assumed safe and marketable until shown otherwise by underfunded agencies. It’s insane.
Figuring out what does and does not have PFAS on it to protect my family is exhausting and infuriating. I’ve emailed with manufacturers, sent stuff to labs; basically, no one seems to know how much materials like this are used on every day products.
Edit: and yes, I know they are philosophically opposed to doing anything quickly.
Overview Energy is hiring Hardware Engineers, a Photovoltaic Lead Engineer, and a Space Systems Lead. We're developing next generation, high-power GEO satellites for the Starship era. We’re VC-backed and just getting started.