342 karma · joined December 11, 2017
https://www.wolframscience.com/nks/notes-0-1--citations-and-...
In developing the ideas described in this book I have looked at many thousands of books, papers and websites—and have interacted with hundreds of people (see page xiii). But rather than trying to give a huge list of specific references, I have instead included in these notes historical information tracing key contributions. From the names of concepts and people that I mention, it is straightforward to do web or database searches that give a vastly more complete picture of available references than could possibly fit in a book of manageable size—or than could be created correctly without immense scholarship. Note that while most current works of science tend to refer mainly just to very recent material, this book often refers to material that is centuries or even millennia old—in some ways more in the tradition of fields like philosophy.
There are several IDEs one can use: https://www.wolfram.com/developer/resources/
>>I also have an issue with Wolfram's documentation or the lack thereof.
There are literally tens of thousands of pages of documentation? https://reference.wolfram.com/language/
https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/program/wolframsc...
When I was consulting at Bell Labs in the early 1980s I saw that a friend of mine had two garbage cans in his office. When I asked him why, he explained that one was for genuine garbage and the other was a buffer into which he would throw documents that he thought he’d probably never want again. He’d let the buffer garbage can fill up, and once it was full, he’d throw away the lower documents in it, since from the fact that he hadn’t fished them out, he figured he’d probably never miss them if they were thrown away permanently.
Romer also published notebooks and PDFs without issue previously: https://assets.aeaweb.org/assets/production/articles-attachm...
Something about his story is odd. Given his shady past at the World Bank, who knows what's actually true.