yeah most companies are not in a hurry because they'll be spending 10000s of dollars after picking the person. obviously they don't mind delaying by a few weeks if they can get a better candidate
yeah that's there because companies don't want to waste time training employees when they know that those guys will leave after a year or two where half the first year gets spent training if he's a fresher. But i see your point, and i don't think the website can do anything here it's the recruiter who needs to step up
yeah ikr, but how do you expect a company to judge you on the basis of a 2 to 3 hours interview. Obviously if you work for some enterprise, you can't show off your projects due to some nda. So there needs to be a standardised way, do you have any other way to determine an individuals worth from the perspective of the recruiter
haha i can totally relate to it. Too much noise, in this industry. Do you think it'll be better if you get a curated list of the companies you'll be a perfect fit for? How do you want the list to be curated, on what basis?