102 karma · joined September 11, 2012
I like and respect Le Guin, but maybe not this one so much.
Jesus, Craig - what the hell were you thinking!?!?
This was back when:
- the internet was new and exciting, rather than just part of the background of our lives
- people used video tape recorders
- "multimedia" was a field of its own, and people made a fuss about it
I got a contract to write a program in Macromedia Director (which was what ruled the multimedia roost before an upstart program called "Flash" came along) which would take a number of still pictures and emit them as a short Quicktime movie, with each picture only on screen for a couple of frames. Definitely not the hardest bit of work I've ever done.
What was it for? Someone had had the idea that the best way of getting real estate ads in front of people was to make a 15 or 20 second movie consisting of dozens of static real estate ads, which would be broadcast on TV at the end of... what? Some news or current affairs show I think. Potential homebuyers would tape this on their VCRs and the go through it frame by frame, carefully reading each ad.
As you can imagine, this was before people had much bandwidth, and long before real estate moved online.
By some miracle this actually got aired a couple of times before the idea sunk into oblivion.
A yoga instructor friend once told me "You have a sluggish metabolism". I cannot deny it.
I'm done anthopomorphising now.
Fast forward to the 21st century and I still think Forth is cool, but I don't have any actual urge to use it.
I remember when Jobs died I thought "Apple - Jobs = Sony". I don't think I was too wrong.
Nubile? Auto-correct mistake? Or just a very strange worldview?
Whether you believe his claims are correct or not, how do you manage to read them as racist?
Well, an annoyance by your definition. Not sure how you managed to declare it universal.
I tend to listen to him at around 1.5 times normal speed, but that works ok.
https://readonlymemory.vg/the-making-of-sensible-soccer/
is fascinating. I've reread it a few times now, and each time it give me an urge to implement a soccer game.
And as justinpombrio says above, that has nothing to do with how good or bad the language is.
I also agree with the poster who gets an old version of WinAmp. That's a program that started out fine and the just went bonkers.
There's some good recent work on compiling to JavaScript, which seems to be the universal solvent these days.
Long ago, when Sun workstations were new and exciting, I wrote a simple Roman numeral digital clock, which just showed the time in Roman numerals.
My friend, instead of admiring my cleverness, said "But that's not how the Romans told the time" - which is true. The Roman day started at dawn and finished at sunset, which meant that day and night length were different every single day, as well as in cities at different latitudes.
Several decades later I did something about it, and wrote it up as a mobile app which showed either the modern time or optionally the Roman time.
Then I made it use the Roman calendar, where you don't have individually numbered days of the month, but count instead how many days until the next Kalends (start of the month), Nones (fifth or seventh day) or Nones (thirteenth or fifteenth day), even if it occurs in the next month.
Then I thought I might as well go all the way, and spent more money than I would ever earn from it on having the help text translated into Latin, just in case any ancient Roman time travellers wanted to use it.
A waste of time and money, but one which made me happy.