bcfaf7738215b4878b05ea51d9f31788838bbe4c8079a885d328b448d22881cd
152 karma · joined October 28, 2016
beakerbrowser.com
twitter.com/taravancil github.com/taravancil taravancil.com
bcfaf7738215b4878b05ea51d9f31788838bbe4c8079a885d328b448d22881cd
Beaker/Hashbase dev here. Not quite, imo. The key difference is that a service like Hashbase has no special authorship priveleges (unlike Google Docs or Dropbox), and is instead an agnostic peer. We think that's an important distinction.
https://github.com/beakerbrowser/beaker/issues/820
We have two different p2p social feed apps that are compatible, but as we plan for future development we're considering ActivityPub/ActivityStreams
Here’s my statement on the situation and how the Dat community is moving forward:
Blahah’s comment above may interest you:
What you see here is actually the “old” version of Beaker - a lot has changed in the upcoming release. Here are a few tweets with screenshots if you want to see a preview:
https://twitter.com/taravancil/status/906583737789542400
To counter that, you can take measures to mirror important datasets with a dedicated peer. It requires effort, but it at least makes it much, much harder for example, for a government agency to take down public data without warning.
I’m not familiar with DebTorrent, but if you’re interested to learn more about the innards of Dat, this post by pfraze is a good place to start:
https://beakerbrowser.com/2017/06/19/cryptographically-secur...
https://beakerbrowser.com/docs/inside-beaker/other-technolog...
I won't speak authoritatively on behalf of the Dat team, but I believe one of their goals is to make it difficult for public scientific datasets to be lost, and data living on a centralized server is particularly vulnerable to that.
Do you think it’s possible to square the desires to make startup investing accessible to retail investors and to prevent fraud? If so, how?
You can view them over https or if you download Beaker [1], you can view the peer-to-peer version of the site with the dat:// protocol.
- taravancil.com - creationix.com - pfrazee.hashbase.io
Over an extended period, yes, this bears out because the law of thermodynamics. But the question is - can people adhere to a calorie-restricted diet long enough to see meaningful results? More importantly, will they simultaneously be able to build muscle and maintain normal bodily functions (thyroids tend to stop functioning normally during extended calorie restriction, especially when fat intake is low)?
You will have a much easier time achieving a healthy body composition and feeling satisfied while eating a high fat low carb diet, than you would eating the same amount of calories on a low fat high carb diet.
I say that the "calories in, calories out" approach to dieting is problematic because it's simply not as effective as switching to a HFLC diet. It makes building muscle tissue difficult, it encourages miserable dieting tactics, and taken to the extreme (which many people do) is a threat to a person's health.
Our bodies metabolize carbs, protein, and fat, very differently. If a calorie is a calorie is a calorie, then we need to be able to explain why two people eating the same amount of calories per day, but one eating a high fat, low carb diet, and the other a low fat high carb diet see starkly different outcomes. All things equal except the composition of their diet, the person on the HF diet will stay lean and feel consistently satiated, while the LF person will put on more fat and feel hungry far more frequently than the HF.
IMO, the claim that all calories are created equally is the most damaging "science" that's been put forth as common knowledge about dieting.
TBH, I'm not sure how a site can work without mutability.