Is it just me, or DDG really shows an image of a turd when searching for "Pontiac Aztec"? :D
149 karma · joined July 22, 2019
Is it just me, or DDG really shows an image of a turd when searching for "Pontiac Aztec"? :D
Why won't they implement proper metaprogramming support instead of proliferating the core language?
Where the Laplace Transform comes from (Arthur Mattuck, MIT) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqOboV2jgVo
Agree. In my opinion, the proofs in that book are not so much about beauty, rather how one can prove seemingly complex stuff with surprisingly elementary tools.
Vinyl actually has less dynamic range than CD - it's the equivalent of around 12 bit dithered PCM.
False. He went missing a month before the bombings:
>Soon after, another redditor named Sunil as a plausible suspect after asserting a resemblance between the suspects in the FBI's pictures and Sunil, who had gone missing a month before the bombings.
keys = (f"command=\"buildsrht-shell '{b64key}'\",restrict,pty " +
f"{key_type} {b64key} somebody\n")
Now it depends on how b64key is sanitized.It's smart enough to remember the zoom level the next time you open HN too.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8195827
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2361...
First of all, there's graphemes are inherently not one-to-one with code points, e.g. Á = A + `. There's simply no Unicode encoding that will let you safely index into an array without paying attention to the meaning of the underlying codepoints. (and no, using NFC won't solve this either, because there are combinations for which there's no composed equivalent)
Secondly, general formatting info won't fit into 11 bits (italic, bold, underline, strikethrough - that's already 4 bits, and we haven't talked about color, font weights other than bold, etc.), so why bother baking in a limited, intentionally gimped version into your character encoding?
Wtf. Adrenal crisis [1] would be fatal. You're talking nonsense.
W-what? I know some people swear that white noise makes them concentrate better, but forcing everyone to listen to white noise? Wtf. I'm not even sure that's legal from an occupational health & safety standpoint.
- audio recordings (smart TVs have microphones)
- photos of your living room (smart TVs have cameras)
- still images of TV content
- SSIDs of neighbouring WiFi routers for geolocation
- data from scanning nearby smart devices Bluetooth
- daily/weekly usage data
- data from scanning USB devices plugged into the TV (e.g. list of filenames from your pendrive / USB HDD)