tangjurine

Well saying that isn't saying we didn't use non public data so it's not exactly a lie

I don't think we need to "solve morality", just having the decision makers not make obviously corrupt and stupid decisions and then shamelessly lie about it.

> Postgres suffers from the n+1 problem, while SQLite does not.

?

Any articles on Bloomberg's LLM and them making that mistake?

Maybe the cause is funding sources that fund researchers publishing too often, and not funding other researchers to double check their work

I hear you can hire a part time one pretty cheaply

Like there's the stuff that can be refactored because the changes are local, or the places to change are clear.

And then the stuff that is a lot harder to refactor because you would need to change code in a lot of places, and the places that need to be changed aren't clear. That's probably more the proper design of a codebase stuff.

The author isn't a professional programmer. He has a couple side projects and doesn't seem very good at coding.

I don't think you can call this guy a coder.

I can solve some math problems/write some proofs, but I wouldn't call myself a mathematician.

It's about if you do it for a living, and this guy mostly has some fun side projects.

Don't think this guy is qualified to comment on ChatGPT taking over, like another comment was saying.

> your work will be so compelling your mind will keep working on it after hours

Do you think for most people, fixing little bugs is very compelling, or do you think it could be that people are stressed and don't want to get fired.

Article linked doesn't have anything to do with socks?

Running water is no substitute for walking miles to the nearest well

Do you remember which article? Would like to read it.

Restriction Fries

It's not percent

Sandwich site?

Website is hard to read on mobile

By the time the app starts failing, usually the people who wrote it got burned out and left :/

Maybe the environment is like a bucket of crabs

I think writing for yourself is very different than writing for school or for someone else.

I suffered through writing classes for years and it made me hate writing.

It was only when I started journaling that I started liking it, and liking that I got better at it.

Is it worth making students better at writing if it means as adults they'll not want to write again?

There's a whole different set of heuristics people develop when working with reasonings that might not be right but give a better outcome for whatever reason.

Scientific reasoning is a relatively new phenomenon on top of the old way.

Interestingly, scientific reasoning is getting so prevalent that people don't imagine the old way existed...

I took a look at the two graphs.

I would prefer the price of onions - seems like the price is a lot more stable other than a few points out of the year where it is very high. For those times, I could choose to have a small store of onions or go without.

For the price of corn, if the price is high, chances are it will be high for a while, so I'll have to go without for a while...

What do other people think?

So do people go more, just because they can?

If not, then being able to more doesn't matter, other than perhaps insinuating that it's everyone's fault for not going.

Ask an LLM unless the time it would take to ask would risk significant harm.

That seems to cover all your cases?

> Statistically, we expect that averaged vector to be close to zero.

I'm not sure that's the case, especially in high dimensions.

The expected value of the absolute value n random variables, uniform [-1,1], grows with n. I'm pretty sure it's proportional to the sqrt of n.

Also, random walks in high dimension return to zero with probability zero, so the sum of random variables in high dimensions going close to zero seems unlikely as well.

Yeah, my design problem is the language I'm using, the language version I'm using, the outdated framework I'm using, and the 3! frontend frameworks I'm using on my job.