58 karma · joined June 25, 2019
You think it’s worth it. I’m not saying it’s not worth it. I’m simply saying, if you ask poor people, many of them won’t think it’s worth it. And most people in India are very poor.
Is analyzing things before during and after making decisions no longer an acceptable thing to do in 2019?
Elsevier’s model is being disrupted and there is no going back.
“It Is Difficult to Get a Man to Understand Something When His Salary Depends Upon His Not Understanding It.”
But what about the plastic pollution as a result of this (from the GPS tracker that will now become permanent plastic garbage).
I don’t mean to say the pollution isn’t worth the fox study. But why isn’t anyone asking if it is?
Who determines, or at which point do we say, yes this study is worth creating this amount of pollution?
The problem is that this is not actually a software problem. It’s an airplane design problem, and Boeing is trying to convince you that it’s just the software.
Even if the software is perfect, this plane remains a flying coffin until it is redesigned from scratch.
The only real fix is not to fly on this plane.
I don’t think this health issue really matters because if someone is addicted to smoking regular cigarettes that only affects them. Pollution from e-cigarettes on the other hand is bad for everyone, even the non-smokers.