HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

ta757579

4 karma · joined August 30, 2023

submissionscomments
ta757579··on X violated its own policy by blocking First Amendment group’s ads
Legally they are, for some purposes.

Socially they are not.

I feel no social obligation to cooperate with a private for profit corporation's marketing strategy. If I ever have legal documents relating to Twitter I will use whatever their legal name is. Until then, they're Twitter.

ta757579··on X violated its own policy by blocking First Amendment group’s ads
They mean that we humans are under no obligation to comply with a corporations branding strategies.

See also: Google/Alphabet, Blackwater/MurderInc/Whatevertheyrecallednow

ta757579··on N guilty men (1997)
They did, re-read paragraph 3.