1,172 karma · joined January 21, 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_C_Programming_Language_(boo...
(Although if votes on my past submissions are any indication of belonging, I would have to observe that SMB seems more appropriate to this forum than an essay by V.I. Arnold on teaching math, or an article linking databases to category theory. This is also mystifying.)
As for your second comment, I think you're mistaken. With the same reasoning, one might think that developers have no incentive to make it easy for users to stop using their application and migrate their data to a competitor's, but this is actually a good thing to do. Google in particular is known for this. I would personally be more inclined to send cake to a site that links me to other good content.
Flattr shouldn't be evaluated purely based on hard, rational economic principles; it's more of a social effect, so it's more complicated than that.
Apple is NOT trying to oppress or control people. They're not even trying to rip people off; that's not how they work. People are upset because Apple makes something amazing that masses of consumers want, but they won't let developers/publishers put just anything on it.
Bloggers/writers/opinionators: if you don't like the decisions surrounding the iWhatever, don't buy it, or write your software/distribute your content on some other platform, but for goodness' sake stop comparing Steve Jobs to an oppressive political figure.
Get some perspective.
Sems like there's still room for something more simplified (but not to Twitter's extreme.) Buzz?
The only ads in which I've ever been sufficiently interested to click, even out of curiosity, have been Google text ads.
We're clearly moving to a more federated system and I'm not convinced that a dorm room startup can pull off an industry unification move like this. They don't have the traction.
I see some variant of this in every "advice to younguns" list I come across. Admittedly I still suck at it.
Maybe it's just the masterful PR, but I really do believe Google is actually doing good here.
Curry-Howard isomorphism blew my mind when I read about it; that's the sort of thing I'd like to read about. Do you know of any good treatments from the lambda calculus perspective?
I recently discovered Knuth's TAOCP but the thing is overwhelmingly long and I'm not sure it's what I'm looking for.
And I thought I might be missing out on learning CS by learning abstract math instead.
2. A small one-click popup note feature. When I need to jot down something quick I write it as a new message and save it as a draft to come back to later. Or if I need to upload a document to access from a different computer I'll do that in an email draft as well. It would be nice to keep that kind of thing separate from actual email but close enough to be just as convenient.
By trying to make a product too similar to an Apple product a manufacturer would open the door wide open to valid criticism about being an Apple knockoff company. By doing something different, they have claim to their own identity. But since (almost) nobody can beat Apple at design, that difference manifests itself more in getting more performance per doller (=cheap construction) or lots of products with special features (e.g. gaming machines).
Also it takes time to develop mass production capacity for something with a very different manufacturing process.
No, and neither are they supposed to not be assholes.
But imagine a situation in which someone elects to profit from a crowd of people getting run over by a freight train. Why is this bad?