523 karma · joined October 11, 2012
So far I haven't tried Shapecatcher a lot but I think that http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html works much better. Detexify is of course only for LaTeX symbols and doesn't do unicode.
To be useful Shapecatcher needs to become better at recognition.
The game is quite long and if you die you have to start over from the beginning. You can also be killed in one turn if you are unlucky and not careful. The only way to win is to lower the risk to die at each turn sufficiently that you can play through the 100 000 turns or so that it takes to win.
Playing it has really given me perspective on risks in a similar way to the author of the article. In real life you end up doing some things a lot of times and then the risk has to be damn low.
Latttice multiplication is much better for large numbers and deals with a lot of the carrying of overflowing digits which occurs in both normal and "Japanese" multiplication.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cijuPxHgZAA
edit: spelling
Tel Aviv is for example smaller, but I guess that the comparison is to the bay area/silicon valley or something like that.
Still, even on an American keyboard () are not terribly well placed.
I've been thinking about adopting the NEO2 layout(with some modification so that I get all of åäö) but haven't gotten around to it yet. Has anyone tried that for programming?