I'm employed by an eCommerce vendor myself, so I'm sure I'd have an intuitive understanding of general architecture, but actually understanding the internals of a system as an outsider seems like a difficult proposition.
110 karma · joined September 18, 2011
I'm employed by an eCommerce vendor myself, so I'm sure I'd have an intuitive understanding of general architecture, but actually understanding the internals of a system as an outsider seems like a difficult proposition.
11. Full-page screenshot service that doesn't suck
I'm happy to be able to tick it off as completed by someone else. :)
Edit: I tried sending it a url with Typekit fonts on the page. No dice. I'm assuming that Javascript is turned off?
I am not a business person. I don’t know what makes a good business. It seems like it helps to have a good idea, great people, the willingness to work hard, and an absolute shit-ton of luck. Being certain about much beyond that seems, well, a bit crazy to me.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3098756
And pg's explanation:
It's not so much that it's ahead of its time relative to hardware as it is something you do in the early versions of a program.
Using closures to store state on the server is a rapid prototyping technique, like using lists as data structures. It's elegant but inefficient. In the initial version of HN I used closures for practically all links. As traffic has increased over the years, I've gradually replaced them with hard-coded urls.
Lately traffic has grown rapidly (it usually does in the fall) and I've been working on other things (mostly banning crawlers that don't respect robots.txt), so the rate of expired links has become more conspicuous. I'll add a few more hard-coded urls and that will get it down again.
1) In the second sentence, I'm expecting to hear the first pitch for the product.
Generally speaking: with Spaceship, we ultimately aim to lift your creative process to a new level of productivity and fun.
Why "generally" speaking? You don't want to speak generally, you want to speak specifically about what you're offering. Secondly, you introduce your product with its benefits. That's great for most sales situations (think of all of the TV commercials that start with "Imagine if..."), but can be confusing for technical products like software. I want to know what your product does.
2) This is a really strong insight:
We found and tried a lot of products that try to simulate analog tools like note-taking apps or virtual whiteboards. Web afficionados work together in Google Docs. A forward-thinking filmmaker might manually copy character mugshots into a Dropbox folder. We heard of people who like the experience of Evernote.
3) The video is great. You're using the application to demo the application. Fantastic. But where's the audio? Why aren't you speaking with me directly? If you aren't comfortable with speaking, hire a friend for cheap.
Get yourselves into Canada!
I've thought about this one myself. Seems like an industry ripe for disruption too: with complex, expensive systems from a monopoly player (ADP). Can anyone offer some insight as to why we haven't seen startups in this space?
The indextank repo proper is interesting (and useful) enough, but indextank-service (https://github.com/linkedin/indextank-service) made my jaw drop a little. It's a full administrative stack for deploying indextank as a service.
I've got at least one +1, maybe two potentially.
There are a lot of feeder groups for this type of thing: the Toronto Ruby Brigade in particular probably has a lot of HN types.
"As soon as you stop paying the licensing fee, you cease to own the software. This is especially impactful with their corporate clients. Imagine if Ford and GM had decided at the onset of the automotive industry that when you buy your car, you need to bring it in yearly for a checkup, with payment — and any year you miss that, the ownership of the car reverts back to them."
I'm sure there's a solid handful of us.
But what's undoubtedly true is that Facebook is laying the infrastructure for predictive analysis of pretty much everything.