54 karma · joined January 11, 2011
It is possible to make a well-constructed argument that positive economics is deeply flawed, but this article does not make that argument.
http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/12/difference-betwee...
If anyone is reading comments before reading the article, I recommend scanning it quickly. You won't miss anything.
Any tips or explanations would be most welcome.
120k for a GP vs 40k for a plumber.
Sources: http://www.payscale.com/research/US/People_with_Jobs_as_Phys...
http://www1.salary.com/Plumber-I-salary.html
I really expect more intelligent comments from a man as accomplished as Thiel.
I absolutely agree with you. I think for a lot of people, including myself, however, the best marketing approach would have been to say "check this out, I did something cool, and I've open sourced it." This is what dcurtis probably should have done. He didn't do any groundbreaking rails code, and there was very little value in having a new workflow of blogging exist only on his servers. I think the value of Nate open sourcing it is much higher than if he had just built a clone and kept it to himself.
Basically, the community response supporting Nate is strong because he did something that benefits the community as a whole, where as dcurtis did something that benefited only himself and then shouted about it.
That's my (pretty myopic and polemic) take on all this.
Your edit is the best thing to come out of this entire ordeal. Thanks for not abusing your newfound fame :)
The point of this blog post is basically that it doesn't matter if you program or what, if you're a douche, you are a douche.
I wonder who that woz?
Oh, how quickly they forget.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-zASTvOUGHH4/TnCuHuN64PI/AAAAAAAACc...
It sounds like he didn't enjoy his job on wall street. I wouldn't enjoy a job as a facebook developer. We all have our opinions.
I'm not experienced in these matters, but it seems to me like a wiser alternative would be to found some kind of Tech Lobby that advocates for policies that benefit the internet in Congress and educates members of Congress about the internet.
It is reminiscent of how the Digg community stopped caring about interesting stories and instead became wrapped up in its own cycles of bullshit, RIAA, Blu-Ray, iPhone, etc.
It's all in the cable. Read it for yourself, and then decide if this government intervention was a good or bad thing.
Note: Above, I have not given my opinion on this. I have not said, "this is good." I have only given my speculation as to the reasons the US gov would do this based on the cable.