Hacker News Reader

Interesting project

supersuryaanshon Show HN: Holesail – open-source peer-to-peer tunnels

Yes you can use a container instead https://hub.docker.com/r/holesail/holesail

supersuryaanshon Show HN: Holesail – open-source peer-to-peer tunnels

Hey thanks for the feedback, I am rewriting the whole documentation at the moment to make it easier to understand and cover v2 of Holesail that we recently released.

If you have a particular question about it, I am happy to help.

supersuryaanshon Show HN: Holesail – Share localhost over peer-to-peer, no port forwarding

Thanks, let me know the feedback

supersuryaanshon Show HN: Holesail – Share localhost over peer-to-peer, no port forwarding

Yes it does, we have a Node API atm, but if someone wants to integrate directly as a Minecraft plugin then they would need to write Java bindings for Barejs.

supersuryaanshon Bare: Run JavaScript Everywhere

I have been developing with bare for a while now, normally our app takes 45 MB to run with Node but the same app runs 10 MB lower in Bare.

For 10 instances of our app, it is easily 10x10 = 100 MB of saving with Bare.