991 karma · joined October 3, 2013
| If the next-gen CPUs live up to the hype ...
| if Navi ends up being a worthwhile solution ...
| [a] 24 percent year-over-year [decline] ...
| single-digit percentage revenue growth [...] could end up being conservative ...
| depending on how things play out ...
| It's all speculation at this point ...
| though that bit is less clear ...
| There are plenty of "ifs" ...
... there is nothing BUT ifs in this piece.
What really turned me off is how long it took them to implement video autoplay blocking. I sent them about four dozen requests, reports and outright pleas, and they didn't even add it to the roadmap until after I had given up hope. They were about two to three years late on that one.
Chromium's dev tools are still ahead by a mile as well, the Performance inspector has saved me days worth of debugging time.
I did some feasibility research on Windows first, and very soon hit some ancient win32 interfaces I had to implement, used by parts of the shell that have existed since the earliest days, something I have no intention of wasting my time on.
I was under the impression that macOS would be much better, but was surprised to find that there's no public or documented API, just a 3rd party open source framework implemented as a hack that combines javascript and python somehow, but seems to get the job done.
This got me thinking that you need a serious amount of expertise to implement new experiences on modern operating systems, never mind crossing platforms. Puts the appeal of technologies like Electron that do platform integration for you in perspective.
Edit: I'd also like to add that maybe we need to make a distinction between the notions of privacy and secrecy. Privacy as understood by the majority of people is a broader concept than what more technically inclined people associate with the matter. I believe that then Telegram's decisions and use case can become clearer.
If this was an error, it would have been fixed long ago. At this point in time I'm convinced it's a deliberate tactic - terminate an account once they start to get popular and see if they can pull enough strings or raise enough of a stink to have a human look at it.
Blaming an "algorithm" is becoming a very convenient way to abdicate from any responsibility for shitty business practices and biases against certain groups of people.
· Becoming an adult at 18.00 (vs. 17.98) years of age is a vague and somewhat arbitrary threshold. If we define it as "knowing right from wrong" and "knowing that your actions have consequences" in the context of the code of law, then a couple of days are not going to have a considerable impact.
· If the major distinction between being tried as a juvenile or an adult is the severity of the punishment and the amount of lenience applied, then it's telling for the attorney to argue for the former, since it indirectly implies that their client will likely be found culpable. Furthermore, if the defendant is found guilty there is a likelihood that their punishment will not be appropriate for their current age, which may seem unfair to some.
If it were up to me to decide, I would treat them as an adult for the purposes of the trial, but take into account their young age as an extenuating circumstance when sentencing.
I have a PC with a GTX 970 that I wanted to try a similar install on, unfortunately the i5-3570K in there doesn't support VT-d from what I can tell.
So it's perfectly fine as long as you don't use it for Pro-grade workloads. Seems about right.
You could match the spectral signature to a known sample to distinguish between bubbles popping and other types of noises, if there were any, but the recording conditions seem good enough not to warrant it.
You could also possibly use an array of two, three or more mics and do some fancy triangulation to get a 3D map of the pop locations and better distinguish between individual pops, but I doubt how useful that would be besides a few cool visualizations.