3,619 karma · joined September 9, 2015
I'm not saying I think I'm right in this case but I also am not saying I think websites like blind/ratemyprofessor/etc accurately reflect how the general population actually feels
Besides, if I do something so bad my boss wants to fire me, fine then I'll go work somewhere where people want me. I don't want to have to bring in my union rep to argue about it since going somewhere else means losing my tenure and taking a 30% pay cut.
The only time unions make sense is when you're doing labor that could be done by anyone and your bus factor is basically infinite. It doesn't make sense for skilled labor
(what letters are used to describe how the word "gif" should not be pronounced?)
When I lived in a "low COL town" that wasn't in the midwest (about 2 hours from a major city of any kind and about an hour in various directions from a couple small cities) people would say this all the time... "Sure I'm only making 60% of what I could be but my CoL is so low!!"[0]
But my rent was still over $600/mo + utilities for a 2-room apartment (each). There were some really bad options for sub-$300, but you were living in a sub-$300 apartment. You can make this choice anywhere.
Gas costed the same it costs everywhere else
Walmart prices were walmart prices.
Restaurants were typically cheap but that's because they weren't amazing - the population couldn't afford to sustain an high-end restaurant. There are cheap restaurants everywhere.
I felt like it was cheap compared to outliers like seattle and the bay area, but not cheap on its own. I'm interested in how this might be different from the midwest. What kinds of products or services stand out to you as significantly contributing towards a low CoL?
[0] With remote the bit about 60% is no longer as accurate, but it's what a lot of people said at the time, and some of them still make comparatively little and say they're fine because of the low CoL.
I was hoping to use this as a project to learn electricity with and it sounds like you did something similar.
Edit: And also this trick is known by a lot of kids according to a friend I have that works at a public school
If this number is accurate and not just chosen for PR reasons, it would lend credence to the idea that anti-human-climate-change research is being suppressed. Is this bad? Probably not, but it's probably a more accurate conclusion than declaring climate change the correct conclusion.
Why is this a problem? You shouldn't be trying to drive it while it's fueling anyway
The fact that the government has never requested anything probably just means they get it from somewhere else.
If there was actually a pedo-terror-arsonist on the loose using ddg to find information on their targets, I'm very confident that the government would still be able to figure out what they were searching for
If you ever find the time, open up fiddler and keep it visible on a second monitor while you browse. You'll be amazed by how much data is sent back to microsoft/Google.
I'm not sure if other chromium browsers also do this, I know ungoogled chromium doesn't.
That doesn't match my experience, I have started to just put the word "anker" at the end of my searches because that seems to be the only brand amazon carries that don't break after a month