5,511 karma · joined March 14, 2010
There's a return on capital than is not spent on employees. That reflects how much capital is growing and how much can be spent on employees in the future.
Everyone else can stay anonymous.
I look forward to hearing why that won't work and what problems it will cause.
Living things are driven by a need to reproduce. That's the only reason we exist. The only reason we have self interest.
A machine doesn't require self interest. There's no reason to implement it, except to show it can be done. And of course it can. There's just no practical reason to. It becomes less useful to us.
And it's just a model. It can have many exact copies. It has no life of its own. It doesn't know anything about where it is. It doesn't have sensory organs.
Your phone isn't alive either.
Government can do a lot of things to you when it controls a lot of things.
And what government is doing is harder to see when it's doing millions of things.
Our fingertips feel using low frequency sound generated by our fingerprints passing over things.
Subways too.
They have judgement. They can improve what was generated. They can fix a result when it falls short of the objective.
And they know when to give up on trying to get AI to understand. When rephrasing won't improve next word prediction. Which happens when the situation is complex.
You have freedom of the press, when you own a press. But the spectrum is not owned by the licensees. There are rules. Limits.
I am not for government owning the spectrum. But that's the current situation.
Even if I trust me.
Audits happen. I assume other people will eventually see this bad practice.
Should they go into the voting booth without looking and randomly pull levers?
Is any negative assessment of the candidate "panic"?
He's terrible though. Is that "panic".