3,102 karma · joined November 7, 2008
Sure there is. "Clean room" just means you have good legal evidence that you created an original work not a derivative one. It is a bit like having an alibi during a murder trial. There is no law that says you must have an alibi to not be convicted of murder, just like there is no law requiring clean room to dodge the copyright bullet, but having one is strong evidence that you are not guilty.
even APIs (see Oracle vs Google) are not protected by copyright
You need to check the news more. The Federal Circuit Court ruled APIs are copyright able, and handed it back to the lower court to rule on fair use. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/dangerous-ruling-oracl...
Antirez is taking a very narrow copying must include a figurative Ctrl-c Ctrl-v. Where as tomp is taking the wider and I think more legally supported(at least as far as art goes) stance that a work can be 100% your own effort but still be a derivative work if it was inspired by an existing work.(i.e. taking a photo of a sculpture is a derivative work )
Full integration with high availability solutions such as Red Hat's Cluster Suite
With Postgres Plus Advanced Server, you can build sharded systems or other replication architectures with a variety of bundled solutions.
Master-to-Master, and similar styled applications are fully supported
Then their marketing copy is full of shit because they promise what rather sounds like a clustered setup with very little effort, maybe not zero config but doable with no special skills.
We’re a nonprofit too! Dollar a Day makes no money, in any way, from donations on this site. Dollar a Day was built by a team of (almost entirely) volunteers.
Fed Chief Ben Bernanke announced in late May that the central bank intends to start slowing down the pace of its purchase “later this year” if the economy continues to improve. He said the purchases could conclude by mid-2014 if the unemployment rate is close to 7%.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-gives-no-hint-on-qe-tap...
While your post is correct for () the type, if I consider () the value, your post could be transformed without loss of accuracy to:
Void is not a value either, and you cannot return it from a function. I think null is a closer match.
Value or type neither half is the whole story.
Another option would be fall back to pre-allocated object pools rather than naively calling new. I know it is a fairly common optimization in Java\C# when the GC is causing performance issues.
That is a step in the right direction? What was it like before beaten by the cops and robbed 10 times a day?
Say I made a show and sell DVDs of the show for $20 to cover all the costs of the show. When you buy the DVD you agree to not reproduce them so that I can continue to sell more copies to cover the cost of the show. You then start reproducing them and selling them at your cost(no profiting right?) which is about $0.05. Obviously some will get it from you instead of me because it is so much cheaper and I will make less profit, or not meet costs. If you don't see what is wrong in breaking your word (and a legally binding contract) and causing harm to someone just because you didn't profit from it, I don't know what argument would.
If they had given you access to the content under a license which allowed you to share it then yeah sure who cares repackage away. If they shared it with you with the specific previsions that you can do this but not that, then you turn around and do that. Then why would you think it is OK to do that?