It's a bit buggy still. To get a sense of it, stick to BBC articles.
-1 karma · joined July 6, 2015
It's a bit buggy still. To get a sense of it, stick to BBC articles.
goto one of the following sites: www.bbc.com/news, washingtonpost.com, huffintonpost.com, reuters.com, theglobeandmail.com
On those sites, find any text article that's medium+ size in length, and submit the article (not the home page of the news site) to gist.
You should see that it's not just reiterating the title.
On many sites it's quite buggy, and what you're seeing is likely the result of gist either a.) attempting to gist something when it shouldn't (like say bbc news home page), or b.) attempting to gist when the scrape/parse failed and there was too few or poorly parsed sentences.
We do extract the html title and stick it in at the top of the page as a reference, but that title, like each gist, is editable by the community, and serves only to act as a jumping off point.
We'll probably change the ratio to scale in a smarter way rather than a constant fraction.
For example:
bbc.com/news thewashingtonpost.com huffingtonpost.com reuters.com cnn.com theglobeandmail.com theguardian.com en.wikipedia.org
Go to any of those as a start and submit one of the articles you find and everything suggested by @gist was generated by an algorithm.
Our hope is that will help get the ball rolling. We are certainly very subject to network effects, so focusing on a niche and providing tremendous value to that one vertical is a good strategy.
In addition, we'll release the api so that people can build their own tools if they wish.