11 karma · joined June 2, 2020
I suppose that it is not that difficult to recreate the basic behaviour of vimwiki with custom commands and navigating with `gf` between your notes. However, for me vimwiki provided an easy way to get started in an environment where these commands were provided out of the box. Since then, I have gotten used to, and somewhat attached, to vimwiki and have kept using it.
Also, I greatly enjoy that it allows for making local references in between your wiki files. A simple link towards another wiki- or diary-entry allows you to jump to that note. It is not only nice for navigation, but also to explore connections between your thoughts. To understand those connections better, I create a simple script (vimwikigraph [0]) to draw these connections using the DOT language [1].
In that way it is similar to Roam [2] I think, although I have not used it myself.
[0] https://github.com/maxvdkolk/vimwikigraph
I greatly enjoy publications that provide their implementation (or a simplified) version. Playing around with the problems yourself, can give a much greater insight and understanding in addition to the fundamental, written work.
However, I did encounter situations where providing the direct implementation was seen as a bad thing. It was thought of as `giving away your advantage' and squeezing out multiple papers before even thinking about publishing the code had their preference.
It is great to see more and more research publications go together with their implementations.
I will add an issue to support markdown as well, I will probably get to it this week.