1,007 karma · joined August 14, 2014
I’m suggesting a more productive argument would criticize the substance of my article — not my incentives.
I don’t want an email marking tool that:
• Charged overage fees • Uses dark patterns to charge me more
Does the content of my article seem dishonest?
I agree affiliate content should be read skeptically but you also have to be realistic: why would anyone go to all this work if not for some financial incentive?
And it’s not as simple as cross-checking their public affiliate offers because these types of companies are always offering higher, private payouts (in exchange for editorial control).
That’s not even true! Loops is in “the best” and if doesnt have an affiliate link.
All “the rest” have affiliate programs too… I was just lazy to sign up for them.
Not everything is a conspiracy. The reality in this case is more mundane.
That’s not even true! Loops is in “the best” and if doesnt have an affiliate link.
All “the rest” have affiliate programs too… I was just lazy to sign up for them.
Not everything is a conspiracy. The reality in this case is more mundane.
You didn’t even read the article!
What would you compare the tools on? Be specific
That being said: besides running a startup (Atlist.com) I also run an affiliate site (it’s how we funded Atlist) and I would agree there is good reason to read affiliate websites skeptically. I regularly receive offers from website builders to “buy” the top spot in my best website builder roundup. https://www.sitebuilderreport.com/best-website-builder
(I originally considered it “not automated” because it wasn’t on by default but that’s a bit harsh in hindsight. )
… unless you’re a spammer haha.
I made a simple tool for creating custom map styles for Google Maps.
You can of course already make custom styles with Google's Cloud Style Editor — but I've always felt it's a bit intimidating. I think the interface could be simplified.
(Here's a screenshot of Google's Style Editor for reference: https://share.cleanshot.com/VR76WYSd)
Stylist is a simple but hopefully useful alternative to Google's Style Editor. I tried to whittle down all the options to the 20% that 80% of users need.
This is something I've been hacking on in my evenings. I wrote it in jQuery and Jekyll cause I have very modest programming skills. Please don't make fun of me haha.
It's a pretty glaring omission that there is currently no way to save styles for future editing. Hopefully the tool is still interesting (and maybe even useful).
The tool has a marketing angle: it's meant to support a startup I co-founded (https://www.atlistmaps.com). The idea is people might create styles and then be interested in using them with our tool.
Kind of a treat to read through the meanings. They nailed most of my songs — sometimes even articulating the meaning better than I could myself.
A few meanings didn't "feel" right but those were songs with ambiguous lyrics. Likely more the fault of the songwriter than a poor interpretation :p