371 karma · joined October 25, 2018
Miners also need to sell bitcoin to recoup operational costs. They influence the value of bitcoin by being an active trader and setting limits to their sale price.
Current price influences future mining. Past mining influences current price.
As it stands, anyone who has access to a private key momentarily can generate any number of tokens for use, practically indefinitely (just sign a timestamp for every second for the next N years). This system is open to replay attacks as well.
It also glosses over the entire problem of trust establishment, cert revocation, etc.
Heartbleed wasn't about RCE at all. It was about memory disclosure -- memory that contained secret signing keys. The fallout was that keys needed to be revoked and rotated.
Reading out memory and extracting the secret keys was actually pretty simple. There were multiple POCs available.
Ironic that OpenBSD dropped sudo in favor of a much simpler utility.
The issue is that implementations will reject valid signatures.
That only occurs if Apple facilitates/manages the subscription.
AFAIK, they are both generally outside of the "Apple Tax" at this time by redirecting subscription signups to a browser.
That point could be directly from the server, or from the hacker's computer to a USB drive, or from a USB drive to another computer.
It says nothing about the original hack.
E.g. basic call options: https://www.optiontradingtips.com/options101/payoff-diagrams...
Tesla has sold 1.6x the number of Model 3's in the past 2 years than Nissan has sold Leaf's... ever.
Sources (US):
* 136K Leafs: http://carsalesbase.com/us-car-sales-data/nissan/nissan-leaf...
* 223K Model 3s: http://carsalesbase.com/us-car-sales-data/tesla/tesla-model-...
In Vermont? Yes, their grid is 100% renewable.
Source: https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric_emissions.html
No, I did not mistype that.
Acceleration does not waste energy (other than speed related things like wind resistance). This is a myth that is perpetuated without merit, but probably because it's typically associated with overall aggressive driving, which implies bad braking habits.
Max efficiency is typically near peak torque for internal combustion engines [0]. For EV's, electric motors are actually most efficient at higher RPMs [1].
Fuel efficiency can be measured by breaking habits alone.
Edit: sources:
[0] https://i.stack.imgur.com/RE4SM.png
[1] https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-fcf541de83bd871b9ba92d...
> Yeah, learning algorithms is a chore and a hassle
> If the interviewer can see that you're able to make yourself do that for the interview, it's a good sign you'll have the discipline to do some of the grunge work...
This doesn't make any sense, unless very, very specific bounds are put on the interview questions beforehand...
Without that, what is a candidate to do? Memorize all known data structures and algorithms?
To start: Not removing jurors simply because they're knowledgeable or have critical thinking skills.
A jury of random people can be confused and then convinced by lawyers. That's the way they like it, and that's the problem with jury selection - they chose people specifically because they are not knowledgeable.
Because the defendant was a musician in this case.
> The Vehicle Safety Score represents the “relative risk of injury with respect to a baseline of 15%,” according to NHTSA. Model 3 achieved a Vehicle Safety Score of 0.38, which is lower than any other vehicle rated in NHTSA’s public documents.
How can the NHTSA create a safety score regarding risk of injury, and then say that you can't use it to make a statement about the risk of injury?
Did you remap that key combo?
My home computers push backups regularly throughout the day, and every day I create snapshots of each volume (how long to keep the snapshots is another question). This snapshot can only be accessed or managed on the NAS itself.
This effectively creates an append-only backup NAS thanks to the periodic snapshots.
That's not the case with git. By default it preserves the original commit time.
I actually don't like this. Maybe it's just me, but I always read these as being condescending, written by someone who thinks that I won't take a suggestion without unnecessary pleasantries and/or begging, or they're frustrated and trying to mask it.
> “Could you please align these variable definitions so they’re easier to read?”
> “Could you align these variable definitions so they’re easier to read?”
I like the latter.
That would be the Philosophy of Science.
While it is heavily funded and used by Apple, I would never call it "proprietary". It's open source.