... or was it just my feed?
9 karma · joined March 6, 2019
... or was it just my feed?
I would argue that unique decisions should only be made once (I'm building it). It is a gated mechanism, where confidence is 0<x<y<1 >y - decision delegated from x to y - rapid decision, upto 5 lines of context and simplified ask <x - full context for elaborate decision
Everything <y is fed back for making decisions. Plus, decisions are logged with fragments/context used.
By Amdahl's law, you'd have to automate 99.9% of decision-making to reach 1000x, 100x is at 99%. That's near impossible unless y is closer to 0, i.e., near unbound delegation.
Now it's AI (cognition/human judgement); technological gains solve the bottlenecks. This is yet another layer. Amdahl's law.
I believe human societies will be a bell-curve distribution of all of them. The scary fraction will wield power/wealth; the indifferent will be the largest distribution, followed by the smallest fraction of benevolent people.
Here are some pointers: High-school science grds that seek STEM undergrad education in India is over 5-million annually. Commerce & Humanities is looked down upon as barely has any value in terms career prospects (Some top high-schools don't even offer Humanities). For STEM subjects, over 5-million aspirants compete for less than 100K 'meaningful' seats - cuthroat yet?
FOMO in the failed education system is structural. Else to blame companies from byjus, to unacademy, to upgrad, all of which claim to deliver on "Career Changing Education" at high-markups, is lame!