1,064 karma · joined October 28, 2016
Free testing on a massive scale and using masks felt like the fastest road to normality.
1. Protect children
Even though I am vaccinated i can still catch and transmit the Rona. That chance is even higher as i am potentially asymptomatic. Living together and having often contact with children who cannot be vaccinated makes that a huge problem. I do not want to expose the little ones to serious long term health issues.
2. Go to events / economy
In that regard, i felt safe to go to events or indoor activities where I knew everybody was tested negative. Now we can have super spreader events again. So I will avoid indoors.
3. Stop mutations
Until we have an anti viral that is effective once you are sick, the overarching goal should still be to have as few infected as possible. The more people have it, the higher the chance of further mutations. The kicker is that now when a mutation occurs in a vaccinated person it will favor a variation that properly has immune escape rendering the vaccine efforts useless.
If the government thinks it is an effective instrument to convince anti vaxxers to get a shot (which I doubt) make only them pay for tests.
If the arguments would have been that the tests themselves have become less effective to detect the Delta strain or that too many test centers are scammers, i could totally get behind a discussion. But then the solutions would be much different and not "stop free testing".
Our short sighted government has bet everything on the vaccines to be the ultimate answer to the pandemic. Watch them scramble in 7 month when a omega variant occurs that hits like a hammer and circumvents the immune response of the vaccinated.
Then we will again hear the all to familiar phrases of "who could have seen that? No one predicted that!" We get full lockdowns as there have been no further improvements in the public health departments, IT infrastructure or new concepts to make class rooms safe. In the end our children, teens and 20 somethings will suffer under the measures the most by robbing them of another year of what should have been carefree joyful youth.
===
[1] https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Robert-David-Steele/dp/1583944435
When ever I take pictures on a trip or vacation, i go through them at the end of each day, delete most of them and keep maybe 2 or 3 max, beautify them and the rest goes into the bin. No matter how long the trip, i try to only keep at max the 15 best Pictures. All filler no killer. That way I am comfortable to show others pictures of a trip without boring them and I also like to look at them from time to time as I know those are the best moments.
At the end of each year we create a calendar with photo collages of 4 to 6 pictures per month. The calendar goes to relatives and we create a photo book from the print outs. That is what gets archived.
Given that formulation I assume that the amount of olivine needed is the same order of magnitude as the 1 liter of oil to produce the CO2.
The world is consuming 97 Mio barrels of oil per day [2]. I doubt we can mine that amount of olivine on a daily basis. Is it even available in that quantity?
How is olivine considered an adequate option to reduce the CO2 in the atmosphere?
===
[1] that Wikipedia article above.
This kind of overhead seems so unnecessary and alienating.
You need buy-in from your team lead/line manager and a critical number of team members that actually want to make a cultural shift, but for some reason cannot. Your regular team retrospectives are the place to address this and come up with an action plan how to bake it into teams processes.
One of the possible solutions is to block time in the teams calendar for dedicated "learning". That could be regular "developer forums" or "reading clubs" or what ever.
If a document is required to be read before a meeting, schedule 10min in the beginning of the meeting where all collectively read the doc.
3SL prep | actual implementation ≥ 3SL | 3SL feedback loops & polish
Post development our deliveries also have to synch with the bi-yearly sales windows of our parent company and need coordination for marketing, regulatory affairs / verification & validation, training & education and the sales team.
The real challenge is to somehow interface our agile development process within a traditional workflow (marketing, T&E, sales needs to know upfront what features will be delivered at a given release some month in advance so they can plan and prepare their activities and materials for a commercially successful software release.
And if yes, how did they do it?
Besides it's climate impact and heat transfer mechanism it will likely disturb the other ocean currents that are import for a stable climate as well.
Once, I got approached for a job at Amazon to help "build the next big e-billing system"... What an uninspiring thing to do.
===
As a big fan of Domain Driven Design I found "domain storytelling" a useful technique when adapted to software systems.
With these diagrams it was much easier to convey complex systems and their temporal couplings. Especially to higher Management as they can actually "read" how the sequence of events flow.
Try it out and see if it can be another tool on your belt.
===
Can I limit HNs search functionality to only include my favorites?
I often know I favoured something but for the life of me cannot find it via normal search and going through my hundreds of favorites by hand is impractical.
The best book on the topic for me was peopleware [1].
Radical candor [2] was something I started but only got to the first 50 pages. Was also good.
===
[1] https://www.amazon.de/Peopleware-Productive-Projects-Teams-3...
[2] https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Kim-Scott/dp/1529038340/ref=mp_s_...
Each 3 week Sprint we deliver what the team commits itself to.
However on a macro level we fail spectacularly. Initial Roadmap estimation of how long new features take are way off. A new feature should be ready in 3 sprints.. make that 6. This milestone should be reached in 2 sprints.. Make that 4.
It often comes down to hidden requirements that are discovered midway or prototypes that get into feedback loops with stake holders and take much longer then expected. Compared to those problems, we Rather seldomly we hit unexpected technical problems that prolong a project (but of course this happens too)