1. Sensor all things
2. Waves upon waves
3. Dynamic or Living Semiotic Graphs. Bring your own terminology.
4. General Artificial Synesthesia.
321 karma · joined March 18, 2013
1. Sensor all things
2. Waves upon waves
3. Dynamic or Living Semiotic Graphs. Bring your own terminology.
4. General Artificial Synesthesia.
1. Sensitive Topic
2. Rhetorical Questions and Ambiguity
3. Implied Criticism
4. Complex Sentence Structure (I’m guilty of writing in the same format as my thoughts too)
5. The Typo (“own country” instead of “on country”)
This effectively describes why you were likely algorithmically downvoted.
The reason we love them is the same reason we love art… To create something out of nothing with the resources at hand.
Most artist love and hate, xor love to hate while simultaneously hating to love ai.
If you can prove someone on a psychedelic is proficient at this task you may be able to pierce the subjective veil of this study.
Representing the broker, the publisher and the house is efficient and is how google can spend your ad budget and deliver absolutely nothing in return. It takes expertise (more money) and a long runway to even break even with todays google “ad tech”.
You just used a digital forum to advertise your opinion.
Most people with programming skills prefer the command line interface. The advantage of integrating computation and design into the real world is increased accessibility and ease of learning.
However, after selling my LightForm projector and all AR/VR equipment in pursuit of similar novel solutions, I can confidently say I now prefer workflows that are contained within a small device I can carry in my pocket and stow away when done.
My preferred interface is simply an easy button.
Salience is crucial in semiotic understanding when designing for other humans that are unique and different to the designer.
The best are very thoughtful people.