It does reek a little of the click-bait style. However, that might just be because click-bait is effective and the concerned persons are serious enough about this to step outside of a dry, academic style.
20 karma · joined June 8, 2017
It does reek a little of the click-bait style. However, that might just be because click-bait is effective and the concerned persons are serious enough about this to step outside of a dry, academic style.
Seems like the solution is to begin treating infrastructure as a public utility, but I can hardly imagine that actually happening.
Are you arguing that in sum total, humanity is better off allowing private organizations to control communications in order to adhere to free market principles than the reverse?
I have a btc holding in cold storage of ~$350. I value the security and control of controlling my private keys+being on the main, trustless, chain. I suspect many people have a similar situation. What are we to do when txn costs rise as you describe?
I know plenty about the Bitcoin protocol, but I havent had time to do DD on Segwit or LN.
From the woman of Willendorf to Courbet's Origin to Heff's magazine, there's a running theme here; one more fundamental than sex-for-pleasure.
Sundays are study days from now on. Hopefully I can catch up.
>This is where monetary policy comes into play. Any inflationary pressure caused by fiscal policy has to be compensated for through monetary tightening.
So you're saying we print money to meet the demands of bondholders, but stop printing and raise the federal funds rate to combat inflation if it starts to grow past target?
But then, I suspect multinationals would still find a way to arbitrage to the detriment of low-skill workers.
Wouldn't that eventually lead to a 'collapse of rome' type situation?
Go for a math or CS degree.