2,095 karma · joined March 24, 2017
Wealth also has a tendency to agglomerate. We need wealth taxes now. Anything above say 2MM belongs to the People (remember them?) anyway, perhaps we continue to license some proportion of that back to the rich for entertainment value (and to provide a funding mechanism for potentially valuable but 'bonkers' projects that might otherwise go unfunded)
This is a big problem. Previously, 'the mob' only came into being when things got really bad. Now it is a constant (virtual) presence.
A car that drives itself is something alien, an abomination, a threat, a dangerous animal, small wonder we want to kill it - that is our most primal instinct.
Yes that does mean wading through each interaction pathway every time you make a release, there really is no substitute.
# Ruby
"#{ "#{1+2}" }"
# JavaScript
`${`${1+2}`}`
# Swift
"\("\(1+2)")"
# C#
$"{$"{1+2}"}"
To which I might add # Perfect
"\{"\{1+2}"}"
basically Swift but { instead of ( as { is 'more decorative' so a better indicator that something special is going on. \ is already the escape character for such thing as \n and friends, so no extra escaping needed for e.g. ${ ys = [1, ...xs, 5]
It is more visually indicative of a 'spread' of values. ~ let*
~ ~ foo 10
~ bar (+ foo 32)
~ * foo barApparently (I can't find the source for this, but it stuck in my mind), faced with a glut of production after WW2, the US could either consume more, or work less. The choice was made to consume more, not least because the industrialists could cream off a larger slice of the pie that way.
But that is precisely what happened in 1933 - the conservatives thought they could control Hitler and his party, but of course it didn't turn out that way. Small wonder they won't be doing the same for AfD anytime soon.
Of course many people don't have the luxury of making decisions that would help everyone - though if they lived in a fairer society, where wealth more nearly went to those that toil to create it, then maybe they could (now that is ideology!).
Indeed it is a lovely country!
(as an aside, props to HN for the duplicate submission UX - you just get taken to the previously existing post)
Only a fraction of the world's population will be able to avoid the worst effects of global warming.
a) nobody will bother
b) that one time they do, the constraint will be wrong in some circumstance, and the constraint will get edited out anyway.