someonebaggy

And infinite money. When you start a debt, you get money.

Idk - a pretty normal one. Why not just let the keyboard keyboard?

Only Starlink can use the Starlink spectrum too. You're free to seek your own spectrum.

In that religion, finding weird loopholes in God's laws is seen as a good thing, and something that entertains God. Whereas hacking is hacking.

Added during sampling by adding a bias to token probabilities in places where several tokens are equally likely.

If someone causes financial loss by posting LLM text and is then found to have removed a watermark. Everything in civil law is implicitly inside a if(someone harmed && they sue you) {} block.

Scrolling down to reach the HTML keyboard, and then back up to see what I typed, is obnoxious. I have a keyboard installed, and it doesn't pop up because something on the page tells my browser it doesn't need to. Was this vibecoded?

Maybe it should be rewritten in Rust then

They have infinite money and nothing else but smoke and mirrors.

Who besides OpenAI said OpenAI were supposed to be stewards of the internet?

They still get to sue for damages if a law was broken

I remember a case from Germany where an elderly lady chose to speed down the pedestrian sidewalk and bike lane and mowed down a whole family in central Berlin. 4 deaths I think, no charges, no suspension.

against capitalism's nature, you mean

Consider a kernel that boots on several different machines with different capabilities. Patching the call instructions at init time, to point to either one version or another of a frequently used function, saves time.

Is it trolling if they actually invented the technology?

It's not like the standards have official legal status. You're allowed to develop your own mobile network technology that isn't 5G and doesn't infringe any patents - the government isn't saying that only 5G can be 5G, so it's a theoretically fair playing ground.

Protests never accomplish law changes - the most they can do is bring together the people who care enough about something to protest it.

Can the US government prove they did (a headline is not proof)? Can Qualcomm even enforce patents against Huawei anyway, or vice versa? Maybe they're just handshake-agreeing on the status quo.

Maybe that's about to flip. Maybe Rust will be built first, followed by C.

I actually made a Linux distribution that relies on this being your latest comment, since you didn't say this wouldn't always be your latest comment. If you post any newer ones, it will break.

Edit: darn, it broke

The complaint is about bootstrapping, where speed is of little relevance.

But you don't because you don't have the money to afford infinite free oranges. If you did, you wouldn't be running a fruit stall.

Folding 'fold' into contortions to use it as a generic List iterator does not "provide clarity".

That depends how far in advance of running the code you're modifying it. You could see a JIT compiler as an extreme type of SMC. Or a Monero miner - its hashing algorithm relies on running randomly generated programs.

So is "Jews" but yet, it's very suspicious when anyone in a political argument suddenly starts talking about "the Jews".

But you get to use hyperbole to defend your side? No, I'm not interested in fighting Brandolini's Law.

What's stopping you from reverse engineering that module?

Numbered throwaway account means you know this is against the guidelines.

No? Rust code has lower rates of exploitable vulnerabilities than C or C++ code.

It's possible to write safe code in C or C++ but it's extremely difficult to read existing code and prove it's safe, without using as much effort as it takes to write it in the first place. This includes the code you wrote last month whose surrounding code has changed. And you have to be right every time while the attacker only needs you to be wrong once. The problem is not writing the code, it is continually verifying it.