625 karma · joined September 4, 2014
It all comes down to risk vs. cost vs. gain.
Anyway, the part regarding Facebook still stands, and we are moving in that general direction I believe.
And how will a system like this handle news or reports about events that challenge our world view?
Not everything takes the form of Trump saying random outrageous stuff that is easily verified/rejected.
Also, you may say that "Fact checked" is just an additional data point to judge whether to trust an information source, but you know as well as I do that lazy people (most people) will start thinking that "Fact checked" means truth and "Not fact checked" means lies. Even more so on Facebook.
I think, in the long run, these systems will be detrimental to peoples' ability to judge any information themselves. This is a problem for democracy.
Not because I have something particular to hide, but as a gay person in a hostile world I have learned to care about my privacy.
Not a huge loss for me, not a huge loss for the US, but it accumulates.
Maybe we can blame echo chambers for this...
But is that such a bad thing?
They say access journalism is dead, but access journalism is just repeating stuff said by people with power. Making them accountable is a good thing.
Trump may have unintentionally restored investigative journalism...
Little difference, but if "as clean as possible" was the goal, I think that would be the cleanest.
[edit] added the little words that my keyboard seems to filter out.
Also, for trust to be thrown out the window, a lot of changes would probably need to happen both in baseband software and in the networks themselves. Not seeing that happening anytime soon.
So just random words and half-words are appended, like: 'misfortune behold oratory plexum'
Then again, these things tend to just stick very well in my mind, so it may not be appropriate for everyone. Also, I only need to do this on certain services, so it's not that many to remember.
The hard part is when they then reply with "requires at least one upper case character, number, symbol, etc.". A certain XKCD comic comes to mind...
No, but automatic removal of fake news is censorship, since all of us in here should know that determining truth by algorithms is really an unsolvable problem in _very many important cases_.
It could/would probably be reduced to a source credibility score, but credibility is subjective.
That being said, it's mostly 2 designs out of ~35 that sells anything at all.
I'm sure there's some potential in there, but it's kind of hit and miss.
Friendly correction: peace of mind, not piece of mind =)
My hobbies so far haven't translated neatly into side projects, but I guess I just need to get more creative.
Their last campaign was pretty much "if you choose them, the world will end", instead of trying to present their own policies and how they would improve things.
And they're still completely arrogant about it. It seems they will repeat their strategy the next time, but then they are in opposition, which is an easier game to play. Also, they try to blame the entire economic slowdown on the current government, even though the oil price fall is unprecedented (and Norwegian industry is seriously oil driven)...
Sigh, I'm so tired of politics. It's all about blame and ideology instead of stuff that actually matters to people.