23 karma · joined June 22, 2017
This doesn't follow at all. It's not what I said and I find it difficult to believe that you even think it's what I said.
Sure. I didn't take exception with anything except the standard HN middlebrow dismissal.
I hardly think it made me look smart. It's borderline trivial. The parent comment was insanely reductive in the stadnard HN style. I was hoping to help reduce the appearance of future such comments.
Sibling comments indicate that it had no positive effect. Such is life.
This does not follow from the above. The set of positive integers is countably infinite. So is the set of positive even integers. Even if "half of the positive integers are missing!" there are still "endless" even postive integers.
No, the best you can do is to stop caring. A distant second is this "server side UA inspection." Whatever that means exactly.
Are you seriously asking how having the value distributed out to a large number of people could ever have utility without oligarchs to "set the value" to some "proper" value?
Why would this be necessary with the big gaping hole in the assertion?
> except for addressing security and abuse.
I expect Google and I have very different conceptions of what qualifies as "abuse" and how to "address" it.
Yes, yes, all of the adjectival disclaimers were used to try to align the discussion directly to how words are used "in [that] document." While the document is highly important, there are many technical contexts in which it is completely appropriate to talk about decades without the slightest consideration of how the same term might be used therein.
To save others time, here's the ISO-8601 document which is apparently being referenced: https://dgn.isolutions.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:8601:-1:ed...
"decade" is defined in 3.1.2.22:
decade time scale unit (3.1.1.7) of 10 calendar years (3.1.2.21), beginning with a year whose year number is divisible without remainder by ten Note 1 to entry: Decade is also used to refer to an arbitrary duration (3.1.1.8) of 10 years, however decade is not used as such in this document.
I expect this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19012083
Here are True Facts about the Cuttlefish
GRiSP uses RTEMS[0] as its base which should make its performance more predictable.