410 karma · joined May 26, 2016
Maybe asking agent to write/execute code that wraps CLI is a better solution.
However, I think producing detailed enough specification requires same or even larger amount of work than writing code. We write rough specification and clarify these during the process of coding. I think there are minimal effort required to produce these specification, AI will not help you speed up these effort.
Total calories will be 1,608 kcal/day.
It's a very depressing diet menu.
Only if you are familiar with the project/code. If not, you were throw into a foreign codebase and have no idea how to tweak it.
Use jupyter notebook to fetch the stock and weather info and feed that into a local LLM and convert that to speech using opensource TTS.
[1]: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/resource-curse.asp#:~:t...
The performance is always raw performance * software efficiency. You can use shitty software and waste all these FLOPs.
If you had $3 billion, xAI would choose to invest $2.5 billion in GPUs and $0.5 billion in talent. Deepseek, would invest $1 billion in GPUs and $2 billion in talent.
I would argue that the latter approach (Deepseek's) is more scalable. It's extremely difficult to increase compute by 100 times, but with sufficient investment in talent, achieving a 10x increase in compute is more feasible.
It's good for games with clear signal of success (Win/Lose for Chess, tests for programming). One of the blocker for AGI is we don't have clear evaluation for most of our tasks and we cannot verify them fast enough.