807 karma · joined October 16, 2018
Which part of this shitty behavior exactly are you trying to defend?
The top "growth" in terms of average number of employed increase doesn't seem to back that up:
https://www.governing.com/topics/mgmt/gov-states-strongest-j...
In terms of raw job additions it looks like it goes: Washington, California, Texas with all similar raw numbers.
Absolutely mind boggling with as much as they pay people they do something so stupid and haven't changed it after so long.
Interestingly there is a rendering of what appears to be a Predator drone on the AMD website:
https://www.amd.com/en/products/embedded-aero-defense-soluti...
This is just me speculating though. I had no issues finding a fulltime remote gig but I think it might be more common for people like me in the DevOps/cloud area than strict developers maybe.
Maybe there is no causation or relation, maybe there is, what is the issue with finding out?
I'm sure at one point studying many of the attributes of what makes a serial killer were considered with the same contempt.
I think it would be a huge mistake to NOT tailor a specific experience for a Linux phone since it would then be doomed to obscurity (more than just by fact of not being Android or IOS) like the million Linux desktop distributions that never "just get it" out of the box for 99% of people.
Surprisingly the error code drew a ton of traffic compared to anything interesting I could have possibly thought about writing.
It doesn't mean there is a law granting us permission to do so, which was the part of the comment I replied to that I took issue with.
Its just something that is gray and we have to do when we need to.
It is the same logic as the, "I'd rather be judged by twelve than carried by 6" crowd, interestingly.
To your other point, it is not "flouting the other" law (yield the passing lane) if its 1 person doing 100 mph trying to pass you. The law is in respect to the "normal" flow of traffic, not the fact that any one person is trying to go faster than you.
I follow the line of thinking that includes utility software and backend services/platforms as described here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_programming_language
Hence, the word has different meaning from person to person. So there is no wrong, or at least it exists on a spectrum, and everyone complaining about the original comment's word choice is just jerking their ego off.
I think you're conflating writing device drivers/kernels with systems programming, which includes those things but is not limited by them.
Regardless, the term's meaning can't be lost if its apparently this hazy.
The term is nebulous though.
If there is some reason you report produce on your tax documents then no, it should not be there.
It shouldn't be the IRS's business to reward people. If there is a reward for doing X then there should be a fund specifically for giving money to people in those scenarios completely independent of taxes.
Its much more transparent to say "we have a fund for X, mail us the required proof and we will send you a check", then it is to add layers and layers to the tax code. That also means everyday people are aware of what our representatives are arguing about and the dollar amounts being held responsible for the programs.
Then we get simple taxes without all of the itemizing nonsense.
To me it just feels wrong to incentivise living a certain lifestyle by getting a discount at just existing. It is great when it incentivises the things you want, such as hybrid cars or something, but what would happen if someone wanted to give you a discount for purchasing gas cars when they become less common because of relations to the oil and gas industry?
Or maybe tax incentives for purchasing private telecom service if/when municipal networks ever become commonplace?
If you they can lower tax liability for a certain amount why not lower it to the actual level needed across the board instead of keeping some cushion to give away coupons?
Which leads into unknowingly building NNs that are actually building classification networks and not realizing approximations might not fit into your model.
I don't have the paperwork but I've always been curious what is was that he gave me/if it was common practice. Also, if it was purely a sort of amnesia, was I in excruciating pain during the time?
I have since moved away and not been back to a dentist. If it is common, I can only imagine the stupid things I would have said or done during the procedure since during the onset I remember being extremely high. It kind of made me embarrassed to return the couple of times I did only because I don't remember what I could have done.
Not to mention all the side-loaded Firesticks with Popcorn time.
I've already seen many people who I would never believe could pirate anything reliably turn to sharing Plex libraries.