sixthDot

Like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_bottle. Casually found in walls.

> I do not know why the JMP is not just a RET, however.

The jump seems generated by the expansion of the `ASM_CLAC` macro, which is supposed to change the EFLAGS register ([1], [2]). However in this case the expansion looks like it does nothing (maybe because of the target ?). I 'd be interested to know more about that. Call to the wild.

[1]: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/x86/inclu...

[2]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/60579385

Anyway, kill the DST with fire.

I feel miserable as I only check 4 or 5 criterions over 8000.

Yes that loads here too, after 1 minute, however that's suspiciously slow. I bet on a scalibity issue, i.e gg docs not made for that.

Nice, I usually use https://www.fakenamegenerator.com/ to find names on forums. Compared to yours, I like the fact that it gives a first and last name. For example I just get "Arngrímur Nikulásson" (Finnish-Swedish), which I could use to create a GH account and start creating PR, let's say for a proglang, and people just thinks "this guy is from northern Europe, they are good with proglang over there". Sure it's delusional, people are not that naive.

good question. That should go from -60 to 0. Oh well let's say from -80 to 0 ;)

I cant believe it, I thought IA would be only used to make the humanity progress.

> Range expressions in a “for-range” loop may now be iterator functions, such as func(func(K) bool).

I guess the return means "should I `break`".

E Don Lancaster

The title was curious to me because I expected more a post about the `intersects` function, e.g the pip algorithm... turns out it's more about the complexity involved by the number of objects to test, which in the end is also interesting.

Might be slightly OT, but let's go. I think that this highly relates to how translations units are organized in a software project. At some point I think that mutual dependency is not a problem as long as the units form a unique "package".

Very true. Working on a proglang is more like running a marathon than a 100 meters. Another thing that would surprise people is that how few complex data structures or subtil algorithms are required. For example in styx-lang, my little retard baby language, there is literaly no binary searches, no sorting, no hash map, no hash sets, yet it is still fast because actually a compiler most of the time only has to deal with very small vectors (5 parameters, 10 enum members, 15 statements in a body, etc.)

They stay in the hole of the black snake.

well, remember that Sonic Foundry was acquired by Sony.

and blowing to the outside

what a quack

allocation is not construction, and deallocation is not destruction. The two steps are oftently executed sequentially but if you think that they are the same you'll end up with leaks, e.g at the level of the operating system (e.g GDI handles). What I mean is that arena allocators are not as simple as you pretend. That depends on what they allocate. The more commonly reason why arena allocators are praised is the cache locality.

funnily the example used, i.e `printf` of single values is very special. Under the hood, variadic arguments that are `single` are actually converted to `double`. See the `cvtss2sd` in [1].

[1]: https://godbolt.org/z/Yr7Kn4vqr

any of those : https://wiki.c2.com/?CategoryPattern

For french speaking ppl see [hello457].

[hello457]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XOly5CBftA

As people already commented in 2011, that's pretty common.

> I'd love to see the codegen differences between the applications

There are two applications, dynamic calls and dynamic casts.

Dynamic casts to final classes dont require to check the whole inheritance chain. Recently done this in styx [0]. The gain may appear marginal, e.g 3 or 4 dereferences saved but in programs based on OOP you can easily have *Billions* of dynamic casts saved.

[0]: https://gitlab.com/styx-lang/styx/-/commit/62c48e004d5485d4f....

Sure sometimes there are deprecations and API changes. Assumptions must be revised accordingly.

I'm on this right now

---

The content of the files included in this reposity can only be consulted by inherited human vision.

Visually unpaired people can obtain the right to use indirect systems to be informed of the content by explicit demand to the author.

---

1. You can read if you're a human

2. If you cant read you might be a human but you have to ask.

what's the most recognized definition of "human being" ? Does the Cambridge dictionary make authority ?

Also the fact to automate an usage of the code may be difficult to define, for example a script that build VS a script that scraps.

I do not have the knowledge to write a legal statement. That's a bit why I ask, in first place.

We have small ones every 10 years here too, in the Rhine valley. The first time is a bit "wtf". There are area where people are not at all prepared, so it's just an ubris thing: "oh well that was an earthquake I guess", and then you go back to your pre-earthquake-activities.

nbdy trusts this guy anymore.

Here that does (version 119)

Yuu might be interested to zoom in the Toulon harbor area (FR) and to observe the numbers: 99 ships sunk, representing 290 968 Tons, but only 3 causalities. Here is why [1].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scuttling_of_the_French_fleet_...