2,057 karma · joined December 8, 2014
> I see someone has sneakily added ActivityPub to the end of the list on wikipedia in 2021, retroactively giving them a success.
Why retroactively...?
The point of these standards is that they all build on top of each other. ActivityPub builds on JSON-LD which is a variant of RDF which uses the existing RDF schemas to define its attributes.
The different bits of the stack are used in many different ways. RDF datasets are really common in many different academic fields and ontology composition (which has always been a thing) has pretty much been subsumed by the semweb standards.
Semweb standards are also the most common standard in graph databases.
New W3C standards, such as ActivityPub, appear all the time and usually build on the existing semweb standards.
I actually use these technologies in my day job (and have been for several years), so it's not just a wikipedia look-up for me. Maybe that's why I think of it in more concrete terms.
The semantic web is the umbrella term for the stack of technologies that include RDF, SPARQL, OWL, etc. — it doesn't really have anything to do with HTML, other than some special syntax for embedding RDF into HTML.
There was a HN submission yesterday about another project of his (also in Clojure) and many of the comments were "Why is this made in Clojure?".
Unfortunately, a large segment of developers think there is no value in venturing beyond C-style languages.
Another dimension in recent years is the static type checking cult, whose adherents must warn everyone else in the cult whenever they spot any kind of dynamically typed programming language, e.g. causing a separate thread about the lack of static type checking in any comment section about a Clojure project.
Classic monopolistic behaviour.
The Danish politicians just reuse these bureaucratic definitions (1st and 2nd gen from non-Western countries).
The service itself is improving slowly and quite conservatively which is a really nice change of pace from the warp speed enshittification I have been used to for years now. On the other hand, there is also a wide range of high-quality third apps for it which Twitter now completely lacks (and basically every other walled garden platform, e.g. Reddit was the latest casualty) of you need a different experience.
(Graze for Mastodon is another useful extension)
It has already passed and is active legislation as of this year, but there is some built-in grace period for making the changes.
I guess it may be technically owned and primarily operated by NASA, but it was developed from the start as an international project: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope#Par...
Apple Maps doesn't even support bike directions. I live in Copenhagen, therefore making Apple Maps pretty useless. It's a classic Silicon Valley app made for the tech boomers in charge at Apple who presumably drive everywhere in electric cars.
Google Maps is better at bike directions, but when I use it for public transportation it's now trying to sell me on routes where I need to rent an e-scooter instead. I only use public transportation (as opposed to riding a bike) when I need to bring our baby somewhere with me. Since there is no way to turn this "feature" off, the directions are often useless to me. I now use a Danish app for all public transportation directions.
Just about the only thing Google Maps is clearly better at is satellite images and open/close times for shops.
And the additional element added to the tuple is reminiscent of quads, also in heavy use in RDF implementations or similar graph databases.