337 karma · joined October 21, 2016
I don’t like the US government, but there is no equivalency with China.
Also, knife crime in the UK is not higher than the US.
Yes the deaths were avoidable. We know they were because every other first world country doesn’t have this problem in anywhere the same degree.
The real announcements were the proress fpga, and dual chip mpx cards which most people don’t need and won’t buy.
Edit: Apple should offer a more elegent solution, but long term this is probably where most of the market is going. Most people don’t need as big a machine any more, and egpus offer 85% of the performance. I expect we’ll end up with people increasingly buying cpu units,gpu units, hard drive units.
There will always be sociopaths.
Look at Netflix. There’s no way to tell where any particular show fits without looking into it. Netflix needs some kind of sub branding to slit out the different niches of shows. Disney is going to get that out of the gate. And they will let just subxniches of people subscribe to just the part they want.
Anyway, the posters point was that they thought the tite was looking down on non-drinkers. I think they were ust looking down on this product.
Also, the issue isn’t just if there was ‘collusion.’ It was what they tried to do. The Trump campaign tried to work with the Russians but failed because they had no idea what they were doing. They were doing stuff like sending people’s emails to the wrong place.
A bunch of people in the White House deleted evidence and used encrypted communications. Not hypocritical at all.
The President probably committed obstruction multiple times, but Mueller refuses to Make a final judgment on that because they believe that is the job of congress.
And the campaign did try to benefit from the Russian influence campaign, and did try to obtain the stolen emails. They wanted Russias help. But there was no evidence of direct coordination (remember the deleted evidence).
This doesn’t seem like much of an ‘exoneration.’
A bunch of people in the White House deleted evidence and used encrypted communications. Not hypocritical at all.
The President probably committed obstruction multiple times, but refuses to Make a final judgment on that because they believe that is the job of congress.
And the campaign did try to benefit from the Russian influence campaign, and did try to obtain the stolen emails. They wanted Russias help. But there was no evidence of direct coordination (remember the deleted evidence).
This doesn’t seem like much of an ‘exoneration.’