In theory you can send telemetry data with OTel to Cloud Watch, but I've struggle to connect the dots with the front end application (e.g. React/Next.js).
52 karma · joined May 1, 2019
In theory you can send telemetry data with OTel to Cloud Watch, but I've struggle to connect the dots with the front end application (e.g. React/Next.js).
Any recommendations as to how I get a bit of hands on experience in the AI "domain" so when I read some news articles like this it means something more to me? Or is this type of thing really only relevant to a very small subset of software people?
I've built things that I've called microservices, but generally have failed to do a complete job or always left with something that feels more like a monolith with a few bits broken out to match scaling patterns.
I know there are talks and papers by Netflix for example, but if anybody knows if any smaller scale, easier to grok talks or papers that go into common pitfalls and solve them for real (vs giving a handwavey solution that sounds good but isn't concrete) I'd love to check it out.
Can anybody comment on this?
Any chance you have a source for this info?
Personally I think I'd prefer to decouple my email / phone / etc from the ownership of some credential / identifier. To me it's cognitively simple that I have a domain name, and to prove that I control the domain I have to make some change to the domain. When I say (type) it out loud it does feel a bit archaic, but to me it's simple.
It would be convenient if by clicking a validation link or something sent to my email (to prove I controlled the email in the domain) I could verify ownership. But: What about something like AWS Route53. A fairly complicated "enterprise" system for authorization is in place allowing certain team members to make changes to a DNS record in AWS. The people in the organization will change over time, the list of who "owns" a domain might be ever changing. Of course the organization itself might own the domain, but perhaps there isn't a clear single email address to assign ownership to. If the Domain Verification spec required everything to render down to a single email address or phone number or whatever, it feels like it adds potentially complicated questions to how do you distill AWS access down to an email address or phone number? It just feels like the actual service validating the DNS info is potentially taking on a lot of responsibility / complexity with implementation.
My struggle is that when I want to build even a simple frontend with React, if it's been a while since I've done any frontend work I find myself having to re-learn what the current set of libraries / tools / frameworks I should be using with React is. For example, if I want a three page simple website, how do I handle routing, is it still `react-router-dom`?
I'm hopeful about Tesla FSD, and don't think it necessarily needs to be perfect, just significantly better than humans. So I'm rooting for Tesla FSD/Autopilot overall. I just don't see how given the findings there is a solution without removing removing the entire FSD feature.
Is there a similar resource for KiCad anybody might recommend? It's been about two years since I've done anything with electronics (I really do forget almost everything) so the gentler and broader the better.
https://text-to-diagram.com/ says the sequence diagrams aren't supported, but your github description says
> D2 intends to integrate with a variety of layout engines, e.g. dot, as well as single-purpose layout types like sequence diagrams. You can choose whichever layout engine you like and works best for the diagram you're making.
Can you explain a bit more about this, if I wanted to create a sequence diagram with D2 today is there a simple path to follow to do this?
Thanks for the work on the project!
I think a few simple examples that explain at high level the reason or need for the architecture would be really useful. Maybe something like "here is how OTel fits into a typical serverless application."
To be honest, how Cloudflare Workers work is a bit of a mystery to me as I've only done some very basic prototyping with the service (and not really focusing on the "edge" aspect of them), but it seems like the important "stuff" that makes them what they are is how they are deployed.
I am REALLY going to show my ignorance here, but is there some chance that the idea is these "workers" are intended to be deployed in the users browser for example, as actual service workers or something? i.e. is this more of a framework for creating service workers vs running in the "backend"?
That said, just to make sure you're aware, some companies pay hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars (I don't know first hand about millions, but I know hundreds of thousands is easy and I'd easily guess million+ isn't unheard of) annually just in licensing for "enterprise" CMS.
I’d say in all the ways that matters this was basically everybody BUT the interns fault.
That said, I am curious if you have found this "linking" aspect of HATEOAS useful for actual implementations? I have been doing integration work with a system that strictly adheres to "REST level 3" and "HATEOAS" principles for the past few years, and I myself have found the "explore-ability" of the API super handy. That said, the self-documenting nature only goes so far, and in the end I'm not sure the internal linking stuff is preferable to robust documentation.
I'm not trying to be down on this necessarily, I actually generally push back on the adoption of GraphQL as the answer to every problem.
https://kevinmitchell.io/blog/mitchine-%E3%83%9F%E3%83%83%E3...