245 karma · joined March 22, 2012
The same thinking could then be applied to our "war or drugs" -- the killing of several thousand innocent Colombians could be easily justified in order to eradicate the cartels, albeit temporarily.
Do you find that a satisfactory trade-off as well?
[1] http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
## GK / Goalkeepers
Kawashima|Eiji Kawashima, 20 Mar 1983
Nishikawa|Shusaku Nishikawa, 18 Jun 1986
Gonda|Shūichi Gonda, 3 Mar 1989
## DF / Defenders
Inoha|Masahiko Inoha, 28 Aug 1985
G. Sakai|Gōtoku Sakai, 14 Mar 1991
Nagatomo|Yuto Nagatomo, 12 Sep 1986
Uchida|Atsuto Uchida, 27 Mar 1988
Konno|Yasuyuki Konno, 25 Jan 1983
Kurihara|Yuzo Kurihara, 18 Sep 1983
H. Sakai|Hiroki Sakai, 12 Apr 1990
Yoshida|Maya Yoshida, 24 Aug 1988
Masato Morishige, 21 May 1987 ## Japan F.C. Tokyo
Comments as a double-hash, key fields are either player last name or occasionally first initial-space-last name, then three different delimiters of pipe, then comma, then tab. Choosing either a consistently delimited format or a more verbose JSON/YAML structure with clear metadata would seem to be a better approach.[1] https://github.com/openfootball/players/blob/master/asia/jp-...
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/articles/how-to-set-u...
I had used it to setup a test server and had no issues -- FYI, the date on the article is today, but the original article has been available for a few months so perhaps the article has been updated.
sudo ufw limit ssh
sudo ufw enable
To automatically rate limit connections -- see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uncomplicated_Firewall#..."Perhaps no one was more victimized by the battlefield mentality that had set in at the NYPD than Walter and Rose Martin. The Brooklyn couple, both in their eighties, were wrongly raided more than fifty times between 2002 and 2010. The couple filed numerous complaints with the police department. They wrote letters to Mayor Michael Bloomberg and NYPD commissioner Ray Kelly. They were ignored. In 2007 they at least got someone at the NYPD to try to wipe their address out of the department’s computer system. But the raids continued. It wasn’t until the couple went to the media in 2010 that the city finally looked into the problem. Back in 2002, someone had used the Martins’ address as a dummy address to test the department’s new computer system. When the new system was implemented, no one removed their address. So anytime NYPD cops in certain precincts used the system for a warrant and forgot to remove the dummy address to put in the correct one, the police would end up at the Martins’ door."[1]
[1] http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Warrior-Cop-Militarization-Americ...
I'm not familiar with the Apple implementation, but something similar was implemented by the Yahoo Messenger client app running on my Windows Mobile several years back, seamlessly switching from Internet data connection to SMS -- resulting in an SMS for every single outbound message and a bill of around $300 from AT&T for all those "OK" and "Sure" messages.
Sure, maybe the gifts are cheesy (coffee mugs, etc) and limited, but I have always found that a real physical product in someone's hands has more impact than an impersonal gift card. I'm sad to see this service go, but I hope someone steps into this niche.
Another article clarifies that the total number of Yahoo Japan accounts as 200 million, so it was actually 10% of all Yahoo Japan accounts. My apologies for contributing to that impression.
Americans are required to state global income over some threshold (I believe it was around $91K this tax year). Few other countries apply a tax to wages earned overseas by citizens. After passing a minimum threshold, tax treaties are applied to determine precise tax liability for the year.
Is it a defensible position to assume that 100% of a document was excised as sensitive data? Since the subject of the memo itself is announced clearly, are we to believe that the presentation of the term "message" which almost certainly occurred one or more times in the body text was sensitive? What about harmless pronouns, conjunctions, articles, etc?
If a citizen were to reply to a government request of information from the government in the same manner, few would be surprised at legal consequences (penalties, incarceration) as a result. Actions such as this, in response to a legitimate request from the public allowed under law, can only serve the purpose of undermining confidence in the rule of law.
The state was built to serve the interest of the general public and yet today does not produce the necessary signals to indicate it is functioning correctly to that purpose. We are experiencing asymmetric information:
* the state holds whatever privileged data it wishes for the length of time and purpose that it finds appropriate within the law and determines whether to reveal or withhold this data at present or some future date
* the state also determines the correct interpretation of the laws in court orders, position papers and executive orders -- and these orders can also be considered privileged data, so the same principle applies about whether to reveal or withhold this data from the public
* any indiscretions in the use of that privileged data by the state may or may or may not be detected by the state itself and, if detected and as it pertains to privileged information that may or may not be known to be held by the general public, the news of this detection and optional remediation may or may not be later revealed to the general public
* any successes by the state cannot be audited outside of the state itself, so the general public is reduced to the hope that the results were satisfactory and correct
Yes, I would argue that the current system is broken.
"The caricature of President Bush is that of a good ol’ boy from Texas who is principled and tough, but just not that bright."
Whether genuine or not, that was the caricature he cultivated and embraced, further distancing himself from the "elite" in the minds of most Americans. Whether a voter found this to be charming or not went a long way to how those voters cast their ballot.
Python's "issue" is that it considers readability as a fundamental aspect of programming and that whitespace is critical to that end. Whether that suits a particular programmer is a matter of personal preference.