3,567 karma · joined May 1, 2008
I used to work for a music electronics company who added metal plates to the products for no reason other than making the products heavier so that the users feel like they’re getting their money’s worth.
> 25% is nonsense.
Yes, I think it's worse than that.
"A woman in her early to mid-20s has a 25–30% chance of getting pregnant every month. Fertility generally starts to reduce when a woman is in her early 30s, and more so after the age of 35. By age 40, the chance of getting pregnant in any monthly cycle is around 5%." (https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtrea...)
Another thing I remember from the misc.fitness.weights days is the statement that nothing works for everybody all the time, which applies to diets and workouts. Just because something is working for you right now, does not mean that it will work for someone else, nor does it mean that it will continue working for you in the future as your body changes. Therefore it will always be a journey of exploration to find what works at the current stage in your life.
Also, as it takes some time to get past the amateur level and explore whether one actually had generic potential to be great at a sport, and that there are more sports than time, there's an element of chance whether someone hits upon the right sport.
- This sounds like spec work, where someone writes up a PR and submits hoping that they will be picked and/or paid the amount they request
- What happens if there is a disagreement about the payment amount? If the submitter withdraws their PR, are the maintainers then limited in their ability to code up their own fix since they've already seen the PR?
- If someone submits a PR and gets paid, then a bug is found in their code, do they have to pay from their share to fix the bug? What if the payment amount requested for the fix is higher than their share?
- It sounds like payment amount is determined through negotiation between the maintainer and submitter, or through discretion of the maintainer. Any clear metric on amount is likely to be gamed.
1. Have your peers or friends at different companies critique your resume. I went from an overly-wordy resume that barely fit on 2 pages to a resume that had concise and impactful wording with all my job experience on the first page. Also, if you are applying for very different positions, you might want to tailor your resume for each vertical.
2. Applying for multiple positions at multiple companies at the same time is fine. No one owes anyone anything, and if you or a company you are applying to is unable to wait for the other, then let the opportunity pass like ships in the night. Don't let FOMO lead to inaction.
3. If you are finding multiple options you are interested in, track it on a spreadsheet as to the application status and next steps. It's easy to get lost without some sort of system.
4. I found recruiter reply timeframes and rates to be pretty abysmal overall, especially if you are applying through job sites and not through referrals, so cast your net a little wider than your specific areas of experience, so that you have a steady stream of responses. You might find a good fit in an adjacent position, the recruiter might be able to make a recommendation for another opening in the company, or it could just be good interview practice. You can always trim it back if it gets too much.
5. Job hunting can become a full time job on its own. With multiple inquiries in flight and the slow response, it can get discouraging. Remember that it typically takes many months to find a position that's a good fit; it's a marathon, not a sprint.
Here is an example: https://www.homedepot.com/p/RYOBI-ONE-HP-18V-Brushless-Cordl...
Edit: GP asked for link to tool that costs similar to an iPhone that is body only, here's one priced at $2500: https://www.homedepot.com/p/Makita-18V-LXT-Lithium-Ion-Cordl...