Keeping the network healthy is one of the more interesting topics. Simulating a real network is the biggest thing. It's very easy to embed yourself, unless it is that closed of a network.
149 karma · joined October 12, 2017
Keeping the network healthy is one of the more interesting topics. Simulating a real network is the biggest thing. It's very easy to embed yourself, unless it is that closed of a network.
"Unable to work because of it and subsequent injuries, she had long lived in poverty, sustained largely by the religion she had come to early in the decade."
I wonder what religion this is. One is quick to think Scientology, but to make such an assumption is too quick and heavy-handed I fear. It seems to be the best outcome, but not one that is pleasant at all.
It is not possible truly to know one way or another at a complete level, although it is unlikely. Saying they are not this powerful is, well, simply not true. It is not possible without creating a huge skunk-works internal project binding people to secrecy.
Google doesn't have the power to bind people to secrecy in the same way that say, the CIA, FBI, or NSA do. It does not mean that they do not have the capability of doing these things.
And yes, if content isn't on Spotify for me, it basically doesn't exist. If it's on Bandcamp maybe I will download it.
Spotify allows you to see songs that you have added that have been removed from availability as greyed-out names.
[5:35 PM] zsh: sopranos in a bit?
[5:38 PM] Adam: probably
[5:57 PM] zsh: when
[6:00 PM] zsh: ?
[6:04 PM] Adam: whenever tuhe f8uclo i FEDEL LIKE
[6:04 PM] zsh: im ready
[6:04 PM] zsh: whenever
[6:04 PM] Adam: ye thats cool
[6:04 PM] zsh: im actually going to kill u
[6:04 PM] Adam: gimme 5 i guess
[6:04 PM] Adam: idk i just dont feel that hyped to watch it rn
[6:05 PM] zsh: we can play bf1 idc
[6:05 PM] Adam: ye i think play bf1 for a bit
[7:45 PM] zsh: too much effort to get up
[7:45 PM] zsh: no
[7:56 PM] Adam: fucking mullinyan kids
[8:24 PM] zsh: varsity athlete won
[8:24 PM] Adam: rip bobby
[8:26 PM] zsh: the bacala man stands true
[8:27 PM] Adam: bacala vs a gun
[8:27 PM] Adam:
[8:38 PM] zsh: yes
[8:45 PM] zsh: my estimation of John sacrimoni as a man had plummeted
[8:45 PM] Adam: what sort of don gets cancer
[8:46 PM] zsh: the same one that cries
these are surprisingly common examples, being of lesser extremes. Varying capitalization and new lines are used as ways of carrying on a dialogue, instead of writing entire bubbles of text at once, producing the feeling of a conversation instead of reading e-mails. The second being an example of 'soprano-posting,' in which you use references to The Sopranos in an ironic manner. The first being a common conversation. Looking into the idea of trying to extract emotion from this accurately seems... impossible. Most of our writings are extremely foreign to those that aren't 'in the know' and seem almost hostile to one another, while in reality they aren't.I'm curious if there has been analysis on this type of writing in general. It feels so much more efficient than 'traditional' writing styles.
I forgot that this was even a feature.
Here are his words about the death of Aaron: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Senator_Wyden_Remarks_at_Aaro...
I'm genuinely curious, I would probably read something about it. They seem useless for the commonplace at surface value.
I suppose that's not the same as Facebook.
Some shows like House I have edited personally to create 'binge versions,' with the intro and outro cut out, with only special episodes that have special endings or intros included. Saves a good chunk of time with House and The Wire when I rewatch them. I wish a lot of other people did this as well. Instead groups stick to following scene rules that leave us with ugly formats, poor management and naming schemes and more. They were created for a different era.
Maybe I'll try to put it out there.
The majority of time on my phone is for a hotspot or to read an article while waiting somewhere. Now to apply it to my PC, couldn't do it.