6,610 karma · joined November 22, 2009
The truth is that building web apps is a large and complex enough field that it's quite hard for a single person to master all of it, and I think we should normalize the fact that any single developer will have their areas of strength and weakness.
Personally I don't see it as a good or bad thing, it's just one way of building web apps, and it so happens it's the one I know how to do.
What you seem to be asking for is a world where the government can override the autonomy of publications and force them to publish specific items. How is that "free" speech?
Actually I think the big trend in JS front-end development is realizing that you do have to think about it! React rehydration is often a very slow step (whether it's Next.js or anything else, I don't think it makes a difference), definitely not "lightning fast" on non-trivial apps with lots of data. Islands architecture goes a long way towards solving that but it's still a bit limited today.
Is there anything that checks for contrast/accessibility?
(Also, I couldn't find any credit or name on the site?)
I remember using something that worked exactly like that back in the jQuery era. I can’t remember the name though..
1) The "Maker" Path: you slowly improve your own skills and reputation as a developer (or designer) until they give you a big enough advantage that you can translate them into a successful product. This usually means first growing an audience through blogging, conferences, courses, etc.
2) The "Marketing" Path: you become so good at the "business" part of your business that the you're able to launch new products from scratch without a preexisting audience. It's tough to know if this really works or not but I assume with all the money spent on Google Ads some of it has to work… right?
3) The "Idea" Path: you have an idea that you believe in so much that you'll basically stop at nothing to make it work, even if it takes years (which it probably will). You usually pick up the other skills along the way.
I feel like the poster here suffers from not quite fitting in any of the main paths: they did not seem to have a large pre-existing audience or network to launch to, hate anything related to marketing by their own admission, and their ideas –while perfectly good products, such as https://nomadmail.io/– do not seem to be the kind of project that would inspire the kind of passion necessary to sacrifice years of your life.
I almost feel like it was an excess of idealism and belief in “the free market of ideas” -as well as the idea that Facebook should remain a neutral party at all cost- that led to overcompensating in the wrong direction, and the current situation.