Try that in Python, Ruby (or ML for that matter).
1,281 karma · joined March 25, 2008
Try that in Python, Ruby (or ML for that matter).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_T220/T221_LCD_monitors
So I'm having issues with the statement that technology continuously improves. In many areas that's just not true.
Yes, it's one of the most usable and beautiful sites on Internet.
If the criticism came from Knuth - fine - but Eric Schmidt? Who is he to make such a remark?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/16/facebook-riot-calls...
"Perry Sutcliffe-Keenan, 22, of Latchford, Warrington, used his Facebook account in the early hours of 9 August to design a web page entitled The Warrington Riots. The court was told it caused a wave of panic in the town. When he woke up the following morning with a hangover, he removed the page and apologised, saying it had been a joke. His message was distributed to 400 Facebook contacts, but no rioting broke out as a result."
Remember that Gmail had a sysadmin reading the mail of users:
http://gawker.com/5637234/gcreep-google-engineer-stalked-tee...
But in theory, according to the old law you actually could go to jail for loaning out your rail pass in Tennessee. So actually all the people who are upset about this law should first focus on the existing law.
"Use of a JAPAN RAIL PASS is strictly limited to the signer (hereafter "you") only."
Surely an outrageous clause like this one can only be the product of big corporations and corrupt politicians. What about "the right to travel"?
The Github projects are a very small part of the open source universe. You can easily build *BSD or LinuxFromScratch with a substantial userland without ever downloading anything from Github.
For argument's sake, let's assume that this is true. What about individual projects then? Surely no one can exclude the primary author from his own project. Where are the female counterparts to Daniel J. Bernstein, Fabrice Bellard etc.?
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/05/18/ruby-on-rails-...
What a hurdle indeed.
chbarts wrote:
" I think the potted example on the web page is somewhat poor, as it seems to be a problem existing package management systems already solve.
The more interesting aspect is the sandboxing, and how this is great for one-off software runs where it isn't worth it to install the needed packages on your base system because they're logically just a unit with the software you're testing. You mention this, but I think you'd do well to make it more obvious.
This is also, and this is something you mention, a way of preserving historic software and data. Bundle a full CDE package with an emulator and you can keep running that program for even longer; in fact, it seems a CDE package could gradually grow layers as time demands, from moving a (user-mode) kernel in, to adding device emulation, to going the final step and making the package more-or-less a ship in a bottle running in full hardware emulation.
This could also grow into a way to run untrusted (or minimally-trusted) software in an iron box, not just a sandbox. But that is harder and probably not your preferred direction."
1) White text on brown background is very difficult to read for many people.
2) Horizontal scrolling is bad.
3) The main headline is far too big. You should be able to take in a headline in a single glance.
4) The placement of the gigantic green button seems somewhat arbitrary. In general, those buttons always look as if they've been designed for a baby toy.
5) I'm forced to create an account to read a sample.
6) The "written about by" references are not clickable.
The general impression is that the site looks cluttered, trying to spread out a modest amount of actual information over as large an area as possible.
"The contents of the header <limits.h> are given below, in alphabetical order. The minimum magnitudes shown shall be replaced by implementation-defined magnitudes with the same sign."
#define UINT_MAX 65535
Key here is implementation-defined, with a minimum of 65535.